User talk:Kuyper

Image:DanicaMcKellar-2007-10-01.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 20:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did - Kuyper

Thankyou for letting me know.Genisock2 23:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ChrisPinkhamHeadShot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ChrisPinkhamHeadShot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ChrisPinkhamHeadShot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ChrisPinkhamHeadShot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Christine Dunckley (photographer) sent this message to permissions-enwikimedia.org on 2010-05-02.

Thank you. Kuyper 16:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

To whom it may concern.

The following photograph used on your pages:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:ChrisPinkhamHeadShot.jpg

is entirely owned by myself. I provided the photograph for use on the wikipedia pages and give full permission for it to be published under a free licence.

Regards
Christine Dunckley

+27 21 7900742
+27 82 0816671

One ping only Turns out my Company's IP address range is what's blocked; terminating VPN to fix the page with the typo.

September 2018

Hello Kuyper. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kuyper. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kuyper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. wumbolo ^^^ 14:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wumbolo; I am not sure to which edit(s) you are referring. I have no financial stakes in any of the recent edits I have made.

It is possible that you are referring to posts from 2010, when I was editing pages related to people who were executives of a company by which I was employed. That company no longer exists. Regardless, that was many years ago, and the fact that you reach out in 2018 (I just saw this) seems to indicate something more recent but I can't tell which updates. I don't recall updating anything related to any employer recently. I was certainly never paid to make updates to any pages... Kuyper 17:11, 6 May 2019 [UTC]

I was referring to the old edits. Thanks for the answer. wumbolo ^^^ 22:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]