User talk:Kushal one/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Jamie Lynn Spears

No, it was an accident. I was going to post a comment under the user's welcome banner i added to his talk page page but i forgot. You have to understand my reflect, i mean how many times has the article and the talk page been reverted over the boyfriend's age? plus, at first, it seemed to me that it was a personal opinion because of "the age of the father is of concern", then i realized that he meant the law's concern, not his. Anyway, sorry about that. -Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 01:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Kushal Hada

Kushal^t 21:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

ETBU

OK, done. The more pics the better. :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiger Guy 2007 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

So...

...do you have any additional requests on the image you filed on the graphics lab? You may want to mark it as done, or add the additional requests if not; the page is huge now. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the notice. Its done now. Kushal^t 01:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha

I have multiple personality disorder ... lol 69.150.163.1 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Eudora address lists on computer reference desk...

Why? Oh no? Is it a bad question? Who is Froth?!? I admit that I am an idiot when it comes to Eudora but now I am scared...70.143.65.215 (talk) 05:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I tried it out, and it works like a charm.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

a new signature

yay Kushal^talk 04:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Kushal^talk Kushal^talk 04:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Kushal^Kushal_one 04:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

KushalKushal_one 04:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Kushal one 05:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Kushal^t 01:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Kushal^{Kushal one} 01:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Kushal 01:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nepal & Newar

Please accept my thanks for taking time to comment on my edit.

There are many views regarding what Newar means, which can differ depending on background and understanding of each individual. I understand and appreciate the view that you mentioned, which is one way of defining Newar, however you should appreciate that there can be more than one way of defining such a broad topic . We do have to appreciate the fact that Newars are ethnic community. I am a Newar and when someone questions me of my ethnicity, I put Newar down on it. Newars are recognized as one of the native ethnic community of Nepal by Government of Nepal, and please be aware that this is not a new phenomenon. Please refer to website of Central Bureau of statistics which have been categorizing Nepalese people into various ethnic groups and you will be able to find percentage of Nepalese who refer themselves as Newar ethnically, and percentage of people who speak Nepal Bhasa. It is sad to say that the number of people who speak Nepal Bhasa are less than the number of Newars according to official statistical figure of Central Bureau of Statistics of Nepal. Please refer to http://www.cbs.gov.np/. I do have my personal reservations about this data.

With best regards,

Kathmandu2007 (talk) 18:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Kushal I am not aware if anybody has done a well designed and widely accepted genealogy study on Newars. I do not completely agree with individuals, researchers or even scholars who try to restrict Newars just as a language group. As I mentioned earlier, I feel that it is another way of looking at it. It is just my personal opinion.

I feel that people are trying to discredit Newars by branding them as "people who just care for the language Nepal Bhasa". I have even come across some articles in Nepali newspapers which have tried to discredit Newar in such a way. I like Nepal Bhasa and I support the idea that it should gain wider recognition in Government offices of Nepal, especially Kathmandu Valley. However, I resepctfully request you to remember that Newars are much more than a language group. Its an entirely civilized ethnic culture, with their own lifestyle, social norms, architecture, religion.....and many more things that a complete society or a complete culture has. A Brahman friend of mine once told me that its only Newars who have such well developed culture in Nepal. What he meant is Newars as a group are completely independent, who have their own group of people performing various professional work either as dyers, barbers, mason, goldsmith, administrators, traditional doctors etc. Newar culture and society must have been quite developed in the old country before unification of Nepal, and despite the effort of past rulers of Nepal to destroy it, the culture of Newar is still well preserved. Well, I think there needs to be more sociological research. In the meantime, I also think that we should learn to respect and preserve this Newar culture which has evolved from hard work of Newars of many centuries. Researcers of many discipline around the world today feel the need to preserve such culture and have been working for it....be it for saving the dance, food recipe, agricultural method, medicinal herbs etc. However, it is sad that Newars themselves do not recognize their own good points.

Kathmandu2007 (talk) 14:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nepal Bhasa

I just wish to share some information to you, which may not be of direct relevance here. Do you have knowledge of use of Nepal Bhasa in places like Mustang and Tibet? I heard from someone that the recent discovery of cave paintings Mustang were in Nepal Bhasa, but I found no evidence of that as the discoverers mentioned that the paintings were in Tibetian Language. Another rumour that I heard a long time ago is the use of Nepal Bhasa Ranjana Lipi in Tibet, though I dont have any evidence of that either. Now if these rumours are true, it means that Nepal Bhasa was very influential centuries ago and that it was used far wider than we currently beleive. By the way, I am not trying to change anything in the article that you mentioned. What I beleive is that there can be more than one ways of defining complex topics. Even sociologists define basic things like culture & group in more than one way. What I feel is that anybody editing in site like Wikipedia must be very cocnerned and is just contributing for the sake of increasing knowledge of mankind. I thank you for your contribution as well. Keep up the good work. By the way, you have not mentioned your location and/or what you do in your page.

Kathmandu2007 (talk) 18:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Santa Fe International Folk Art Market

What's the point of putting an "under construction" tag on an empty page? Is there some fear that the space will be taken by something else? And wouldn't doing that for somebody who has a conflict of interest in the article be a violation of WP:COI? When will there be something here? Corvus cornix_talk 23:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Just put a {{db-author}} tag on it and delete the rest of it. It's not that major a deal, it just seemed a little strange.  :) Corvus cornix_talk 03:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Kushal one/ETBU

Why this is here? It's under categories same as the real ETBU because your apparent user page is a port of that page, which is how I found it. Aepoutre (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I will unwikify the categories right away. thanks. Kushal 03:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Jccort (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

First, second

Kushal, I've looked through the MoS pages and CMOS and don't see a specific guideline on the use of "first, second" in the sense of "firstly, secondly". However, I'm pretty sure this is because they're relying on the dictionary definition to be sufficient, not because they don't contemplate it. Search for "first," (with the comma) in WT:MOS and archives and you'll see that people who do a lot of work on featured articles use "first, second" in this sense quite a lot. (Talk pages are of course more informal.) - Dan Dank55 (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Graphic Lab Image

Graphics Request It is advisable to check your requests every so often, that way we get feedback. Thank you XcepticZP (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: your comments at WP:N/CA

To endorse the proposal (as you seem to want to do!), there is a page for this at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:ProseTimeline

Template:ProseTimeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Spoiler warnings

You wrote in another place:

Hroðulf, sometime in late 2005 or 2006 (date not accurate), there was a surge in using spoiler warning. I do not see any of those now. Could you find out why? Thanks. Kushal 15:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Here are two links about the spoiler warning tag Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_November_8 and Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_November_14. Kushal 19:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

After a very long wikibreak, I am as surprised as you by the utter annihilation of spoiler warnings. This made it hard for me to read Damages (TV series) while watching it. As well as the links you gave, it turns out the case for deleting the warnings was discussed for years at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler before finally throwing out the whole thing in 2007. It doesn't sound like they are coming back any time soon. The culture here at Wikipedia seems to change all the time, despite the complex bureaucracy. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Yes, Spoiler warning seems to have been a rather comprehensive debate. I thought there might be something to learn for the current debate on Tempate:ProseTimeline. (I do realize that the debate about ProseTimeline is closed by now.) What do you plan on doing with the template (if anything)? Kushal 17:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I would like to edit Template:ProseTimeline to make it a talk page template. I really don't see the point of warning every reader that the article is not up to good article standards. It is bad enough that they have to read ugly prose. However, my assessment of the responses to the template for deletion discussion is that I don't think I will get very far. So I will go click 'edit' somewhere else on the encyclopedia. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

How about changing the template so that it is just a category (nothing shows up in the article, just the footnote) in the article, there is a full explanation in the talk page, and the article gets added to this (lengthy) list of articles in the [[Category:ProseTimeline]]. Even though there was quite some opposition to deletion, most comments——IMHO——were receptive of the need for change. You are a responsible administrator, Hroðulf. I am glad that administrators like you are around. Happy editing, Kushal 18:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, guess who?

Guess who? 67.173.249.88 (talk) 23:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Dissociative identity disorder? Kushal (talk) 23:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Kushal one. You have new messages at User:Frank.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Prince Chunk: Deletion review?

Hey, I was wondering if there was anything about a deletion review (or something similar) on the article Prince Chunk?--DrWho42 (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Would you know how to place Prince Chunk under deletion review? I already marked the corresponding article but haven't gone through the motions of nomination.--DrWho42 (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Prince Chunk

Prince Chunk is now under deletion review. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 21:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Prince Chunk

Please contribute to current discussion on the AfD for Prince Chunk.--DrWho42 (talk) 19:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Reference Desk Barnstar
		Thank you for answering my screen resolution question on the Reference Desk! --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Wow! Thanks for the barn star. You are very generous. Kushal (talk) 11:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Dick Cheney quote

Following on from yesterday's IRC conversation (I think it was with you), I've tracked down the event - Cheney spoke to the Discovery Institute on August 14th 1992. I've not been able to find a direct copy of that quote in contemporary reporting, but it certainly fits with what was said at the time.

"There's no doubt we have the ability to prevail," he said. "But then what do you do?" Asked why the Bush administration had left Saddam Hussein in power at the end of the gulf war, Cheney assured the audience of 3,260 veterans and family members that the U.S. military could have ousted Saddam. "But Saddam is not the kind of individual that you could pull a paddy wagon up and say, 'Come on, Saddam, you're going to the slammer,'" said Cheney. "I would guess if we'd gone on to Baghdad, I'd still have troops in Iraq."

(Helen Ellsberg - The News Tribune - Sunday, August 16, 1992)

The bulk of his remarks that day were focused on intervention in Bosnia, which he described as potentially a second Vietnam. "If we were to intervene with U.S. forces on the ground, it would require a very large number of forces ... take a very long time and would entail probably significant casualties for us". "[T]here are some problems that don't lend themselves to a military solution".

Some remarks similar to what was quoted by the Seattle PI appeared in the Washington Post on *September* 15th, from a speech Cheney gave to the "Detroit Economic Club" on September 14th:

If you get into the business of committing U.S. forces on the ground in Iraq, to occupy the place, my guess is I'd probably still have people there today instead of having been able to bring them home. ... The bottom line question for me was: How many additional American lives is Saddam Hussein worth? The answer: not very damn many.

The "not very damn many" quote was also attributed to Cheney in a late-January article by Leslie Gelb (no source date given), then quoted again in a May article by the Associated Press, where he'd said it to the National Press Club on May 20th, before reappearing in September (above). The comments are quite probably from a standard prepared talk Cheney gave in 1992 to various audiences, so it doesn't seem too odd that they're being reported from a different venue to the one mentioned in the article, and it seems to be pretty likely he'd have said them in August as well. Shimgray | talk | 19:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think we need to expand the sources, really - it's sourced to the Seattle PI, and what I was digging around for was just to confirm that even if we didn't have a verbatim contemporary quote to corroborate it, we do have enough contemporary evidence that they probably weren't making it up. Sanity-checking, I guess :-) Shimgray | talk | 20:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, Pretzels^Talk! 15:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

• That's fine Kushal. You can check up on the Community bulletin board on the Community portal to keep up to date with information on projects like this! Pretzels^Talk! 17:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Request

Hi, I noticed that you can read Nepali. When you have the time, would you mind translating this short article for me? It would be very much appreciated. If you can't do it, let me know. Please reply on my talk page, thanks. Khoikhoi 04:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

पेरु समाजवादी पार्टी (Partido Socialista del Perú) पेरुमा एउटा समाजवादी राजनैतिक दल हो | जुलिओ सेर्जिओ कस्त्रो गोमेस दलको महासचिब हो |[१] २००६ संसदीय निर्वाचनमा दलले १३४१६६ मतहरू (१.२५%) पायो | तर दलले संसदमा कुनै क्षेत्र जित्न सकेन |[२

Peru Socialist Party is a socialist political party in Peru. Julio Sergio Castro Gomez is the party secretary.[1] In the 2006 parliamentary elections, it won 134166 votes (1.25%). However, it did not win any areas(?) in the election.[2]Kushal (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks for the quick response! Khoikhoi 04:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

how do we reply on the help desk to any topic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thugs13 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey there! Just click edit in the section you want to edit, and that's it. Please feel free to practice here. Click the edit up there in the right (the closest one) and type away! Kushal (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

You've been loved by HaiyaTheWin

Hey there! HaiyaTheWin has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. If you don't really like it, feel free to revert it and make it go away, and no hard feelings; after all, it's just a small token of appreciation. If you like it, just add your name here, but again, there's no need to feel upset if you don't. Love and best wishes, HaiyaTheWin IS The Win! 01:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

=) HaiyaTheWin IS The Win! 01:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Kushal one/Gakhars

User:Kushal one/Gakhars, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kushal one/Gakhars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Kushal one/Gakhars during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Is it possible to merge anything from this into the main page? Apparently, there have been a number of edits there. Please feel free to incorporate the changes as you see fit. Kushal (talk) 23:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi There

Hi Kushal g, please to meet with you. I am editing Wikipedia a while now. I am based in Sydney. Hope we can help each other creating articles. Thanks

Ashishlohorung (talk) 13:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Nice to meet you too. Sorry for the late reply. How can I help you? Kushal (talk) 23:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following [http://goo.gl/forms/ZyYQm6uu7e form]. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your collections have been exported

Thank you again for using Wikipedia's beta Collections feature. Because you indicated an interest in keeping your public collection(s), we have transferred any collections you created to a new url. We apologize for the delay. You can now find them here. This new page is not accessible via any menu, so we recommend bookmarking the page if you plan to return. Thank you for experimenting with us!

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kushal one. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kushal one. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)