User talk:Kurudujangama

Your article ಸುಬ್ರಹ್ಮಣ್ಯ ರಾಜೆ ಅರಸ್

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ಸುಬ್ರಹ್ಮಣ್ಯ ರಾಜೆ ಅರಸ್ to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, ಸುಬ್ರಹ್ಮಣ್ಯ ರಾಜೆ ಅರಸ್

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, ಸುಬ್ರಹ್ಮಣ್ಯ ರಾಜೆ ಅರಸ್. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chaduranga. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chaduranga. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Largoplazo (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article ಚಮಕ್

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page ಚಮಕ್ to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. MT Train^Talk 11:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions to Wikipedia

Hello Kurudujangama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Your recent contributions have been in Kannada, a language for which we have another version. I also see that you have already made an edit there, and the articles you recently created might be helpful in Kannada Wikipedia. Unfortunately, foreign language articles in the English Wikipedia that remain untranslated for two weeks get deleted. Thanks, MT Train^Talk 11:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, ಚಮಕ್

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, ಚಮಕ್. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chamak (film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chamak (film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ಕೈಫ಼ಿ ಅಜ಼್ಮಿ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ಕೈಫ಼ಿ ಅಜ಼್ಮಿ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 12:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurudujangama (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I assume that I've been blocked because I mistakenly created a page on Kaifi Azmi in Kannada language in the English Wikispace. I later rectified this mistake by creating the page in the Kannada wikispace and the wrong page has been marked for speedy deletion. As I'm relatively new to wiki editing this was a beginner's mistake and I'll take care not to repeat it again Kurudujangama (talk) 04:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have failed to convince us you would edit constructively if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 12:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: This user has been here since April 2018 and has done nothing constructive. However, they have created several pages that have been speedy-deleted, which is disruptive. Here is a Google translation of the page I deleted (correctly tagged as A7/G11):

"Attar Hussain Rizvi, best known by the nickname "Kaifi Azmi" (1 January - 1 May), is one of India's greatest Urdu poets. Kaifidi is credited with the first ever introduction of Urdu literature in Indian cinema. Kasim of Peerza, along with Jaun Ilia and others, have hosted some of the most memorable Urdu conferences of the 7th century."

Kaifi Azmi, btw, exists as an article here and on many other projects, as opposed to a silly unsourced paragraph. What the user says makes no sense. I see no reason to unblock.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]