User talk:Kurtwagen18

May 2014

It does not matter who you are, someone from the production house, or the producer, director of the film. Do not remove sourced content from the article. If you have any question or comment you may contact me here. Thank you. Tito☸Dutta 18:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not send me email unnecessarily, specially with unclear information. Which website you think doesn't know the box office record of our movie and all the reports are not true. In Wikipedia, we work on verifiable sources, and not on any person's personal knowledge. If you are asking to remove the entire box-office section, that will be never be done. The Times of India is one of the best source we can have. If you can collect reliable secondary source with some other information of the film's box office, I'll try to help. Tito☸Dutta 16:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Read again— do not send email unnecessarily, we have sourced information, here "only producer knows the truth" does not mean any sense. We don't write articles based on "producer's personal knowledge". If you want to sue Wikipedia or Wikimedia, you may do it. Tito☸Dutta 18:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kurtwagen, administrator here. See WP:NLT: you may threaten a legal case, but you may not edit while you are doing so, and I may block you until you drop the threat, if it was indeed you who emailed Titodutta such a threat. And Titodutta is right: the first venue of discussion is the article talk page, and then, maybe, the editor's talk page.
As for that article content, the information you removed is valid, relevant, and verified, and if you keep removing it you will be blocked. What you are doing, whether you're acting on someone's behalf or not, is not OK--and if you are acting on the company's behalf, you should really read WP:COI, and you may also be prevented from editing that and related articles. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassment via email, primarily; secondarily, unacceptable article edits caused by possible COI. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 19:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]