User talk:Kupredu

Welcome!

Hello, Kupredu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Agathoclea (talk) 23:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on April 9 tragedy‎

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

--Kober^Talk 19:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Salvador Allende has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to John Bolton

Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism in legitimate content disputes. The other editor challenged the reliability of the source cited. Please address the content dispute on the talk page instead of engaging in an edit war. Ray^Talk 17:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edtis to Salvador Allende

Why did you removed this from the lead?

Although still a controversial figure, Allende was chosen in 2008, from a sample of 1.5 million people, as the Greatest Chilean in history, winning over other important national figures such as Arturo Prat, Pablo Neruda and Gabriela Mistral.^[1]

Likeminas (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had reverted the page and I didn't realize it was removed. Kupredu (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I reverted your edit. We should get consensus before removing the section Soviet involvment. I think, the section about violence can be safetly removed as it lacks reliable sources and it's loaded with POV's.

Likeminas (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandr Kolchak

Could you comment on the recent removal of much information from this article? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hamas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety ^talk 20:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. I was unaware that I was near the rv limit.Kupredu (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ [1] Allende es el "gran chileno"

[1] [1] Allende es el "gran chileno"

[1]