User talk:Kunst&Architektur

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernhard Kammel (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bernhard Kammel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bernhard Kammel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Kunst&Architektur! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bernhard Kammel

Hello, Kunst&Architektur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bernhard Kammel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bernhard Kammel

Hello, Kunst&Architektur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bernhard Kammel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Many people come to edit Wikipedia with mistaken ideas as to the nature of Wikipedia, and in perfectly good faith do things which are not in line with Wikipedia policies, and unfortunately you seem to have done so. The account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, and both your editing history and your username indicate that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Before making any unblock request, you should read the guide to appealing blocks. JBW (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kunst&Architektur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My chosen username simply describes my fields of interest. Kunst&Architektur translates into art&architecture. I don't follow any commercial interest with this user account, as the very low frequency of edits would suggest in addition. Therefore please unblock my user account. Kunst&Architektur (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Username was mistaken for a company name, honest mistake. Sorry. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 10:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please wait while I discuss this with the blocking admin. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi there Kunst&Architektur. So I have talked with the blocking admin. It seems there was a company by the name of Kunst & Architektur in London and that was the source of the confusion. Upon closer inspection that company seems defunct since 2003.

The other area of concern was the draft article you wrote. While the subject of the article did participate in a film festival, it does not seem like they have achieved the level of notoriety that is required for a Wikipedia article. See WP:Notability for more information.

It would not be appropriate to work on that subject here because of that. I am happy to e-mail you what you wrote if you want to use it elsewhere. I can proceed with the unblock on that understanding. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

My apologies for the block. I found that your username was the name of a company, and was not aware that the company no longer exists. Thanks are due to HighInBC for sorting it out. JBW (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention and for unblocking my account. Concerning the last article draft I was editing some time ago, I think being new to creating articles on Wikipedia I got the wrong angle on the topic. Bernhard Kammel is a film director but not solely. Some years ago he founded an interdisciplinary art institution focusing on film, contemporary (often classical) music, fine arts (especially large scale installations) and arthouse film. Find informationen about the stunningly renovated historical building, REAKTOR in general and its program at https://www.reaktor.art/en/about. Once a year an international open call searches for artistic concepts granting a production budget and a residency in the field of fine arts and REAKTOR International Film Festival presents once a year films by directors from all over the world. Therefore REAKTOR and its founder and director Bernhard Kammel in my opinion is of relevance for an English speaking community. I would like to add this aspects to the article, hoping for your reevaluation of the topic. Please let me know your thoughts about it - HighInBC & JBW. Kunst&Architektur (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the page Draft:Bernhard Kammel so that you can do further work on it. I will try to get back to you soon with some comments and advice about it, but you are perfectly free to start work on it as soon as it's convenient for you.JBW (talk) 10:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you JBW! In the upcoming days I will add some information as described and would be glad about your feedback on the additional parts. I think once these information is integrated the overall relevance should be clearer. Of course I will also add more sources to the already existing points.Kunst&Architektur (talk) 13:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello JBW! Please have a look at the additions to the article. I would be happy about your feedback in order to improve it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernhard Kammel (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bernhard Kammel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bernhard Kammel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bernhard Kammel

Hello, Kunst&Architektur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bernhard Kammel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)