User talk:Kungfujoe

Cornell

I have just started WikiProject Cornell University, an attempt to thoroughly cover topics related to Cornell. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Thanks! —mercuryboard^talk 05:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on this project. -Erik Harris (Class of 2000)

Non-existent Halo redirects

Hello!

I noticed you went through and marked a lot of Halo redirects for Proposed Deletion. Thanks. However, redirects which link to a non-existent article may be better served by speedy deletion, as they do fit the criteria for speedy deletion under redirect criteria 1. I have gone through and promoted (?) them all to speedy. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 18:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ITT/IIT

You'd think there would be no need for the disambiguation there (I'm getting dyslexic these days), but there's actually discussion of it at the ITT Technical Institute talk page: "This article is about the chain of technical institutes. For the private, single-campus university in Chicago (IIT), see Illinois Institute of Technology." Apparently the IIT people are sensitive about it. I'm not the soruce of the insanity, just thought the DAB page should match the notice at the top of the other article. Ojcit 22:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts

You are listed as a participant in this Wikiproject, which appears to have ground to a halt - I'm contacting all participants to try to get things rolling again... hope you can help! -- Medains 08:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Martial Arts

My bad I should not have removed it. At the time I did so because I thought it was a term rather than an art - the article itself seems to make that distinction. The martial art would by Shorinji Kempo or Nippon Kempo, etc. However, we also have karate and jujutsu so again I should have left it. Perhaps the Kenpo article should be changed somewhat. As for double entries - I remember a while back there were so many it was silly. I think one should choose the best choice which would be the country of origin. Cheers Peter Rehse 00:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some people also practice a more "generalized" version that they simply refer to as Kempo/Kenpo, not necessarily directly part of one of the major organizations/systems of Kempo. It's not my place to judge the legitimacy of "general" Kempo training, but I know I've gotten some weird looks from people when I've asked what kind of Kempo they study. :) As you point out, though, other "umbrella" terms for groups of martial systems are also included on the list. —Erik Harris 18:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the Silat - just that guy keeps coming back. Anyway - thanks for keeping an eye out.Peter Rehse 00:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kateda

Interesting edits on the Kateda article. Can you point me in the direction of some articles on the material you mention? Punanimal 4 Mar 2007, 12:57 UTC

I don't know what edits you're talking about, Punanimal. My edits on the Kateda article have all involved fixing typos and removing non-notable references. I haven't added any material. —Erik Harris 13:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me understand this style and compare it to others?

Hello,

Can you help me understand this style and compare it to others? Please leave a note on my talk page. http://ihadojo.com/Origins/index.htm Tkjazzer 23:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please also check out: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category_talk:Martial_arts for the family tree discussion. Tkjazzer 23:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

incorporate Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan in to main martial arts articles

Please help me incorporate this http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan in to the other main martial arts articles. Tkjazzer 23:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wong Shun Leung

Thanks for fixing those though I'd got most but must have missed a few. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 08:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Secret Maryo Chronicles

An editor has nominated Secret Maryo Chronicles, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Maryo Chronicles (3 nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Tim Song (talk) 07:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Free images to commons

Thank you for uploading free images/media such as File:SMC15PromoShot.png to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see [1]). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kungfujoe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kungfujoe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kungfujoe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]