User talk:Kunayev

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kazakhstan. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kazakhstan. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kazakhstan, you will be blocked for vandalism. — Kralizec! (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should be aware that I do not have any particular interest in, or expertise about the Kazakhstan, Kazakhs, or any related articles. My presence on these pages is solely as an un-involved administrator who was asked to help protect the articles from POV-pushing, censorship, and vandalism. Your removal of messages from Talk:Kazakhstan is not acceptable; as the Wikipedia guideline on Talk pages notes, you should not "delete the comments of other editors without their permission." If you persist in this or other disruptive behaviour, you will be blocked from editing. Regards, — Kralizec! (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your further removal of comments on Talk:Kazakhstan have been reverted. If you continue to remove good comments, then you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Ajraddatz (Talk - Contributions) 22:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of five days for disruptive editing. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Military of Kazakhstan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Buckshot06 (talk) 09:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kazakh national-patriots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kazakh national-patriots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh national-patriots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 01:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]