User talk:Kunal gurjar

Kunal Gurjar

Kunal baisla born to a gurjar family. He is astudent of science stream at 12th class.he is admin of 2 Facbook pages named Gurjar Ministry and govt. of gurjar's.he lived in mewla bhatti village in loni, ghaziabad. He belongs to Baisla clan of Gurjar.

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Gurjars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*'''Ramesh Bidhuri'''born 1961) is an [[Member of Parliament]] and a member of [[ Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP).Ramesh Bidhuri

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on List of Gurjars, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jats. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Jats was changed by Kunal gurjar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960978 on 2014-06-14T06:04:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at List of Gurjars. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Gurjars may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
Bhuvneshwar Kumar]](born 5 February 1990) is an Indian [[cricketer]] <ref [http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/player/326016.html Bhuvneshwar Kumar - Cricinfo]</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Gurjars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

National Centre for the Arts}}</ref>.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Volume One (A To Devo), Volume 1|author=Amaresh Datta|publisher=Sahitya Akademi|year=2006|id=ISBN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Gurjars may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

People want to be able to verify information on Wikipedia. So, significant edits need have their content cited using reliable sources. See verifiablity. This means that information must be published, and presumably vetted, by reliable groups and individuals. What you should do is to locate a source that supports the edit you wish to make. Then add a citation to that. Peruse wp:welcome to learn about editing Wikipedia. You can also visit the Teahouse for information and assistance. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Caste and social group articles

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 08:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to List of Gurjars.

Please will you stop adding violations of our policy regarding biographies of living people at List of Gurjars. You'll find some useful explanatory notes at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic Banned

Subsequent to your warning above, you are now placed under discretionary sanctions. You are hereby topic banned from editing anything related to Gurjars across all name spaces in Wikipedia for a period of three months from now. Any violations of this topic ban may be dealt with by escalating blocks or an increase in your topic ban or a combination of both. Please utilize this time to familiarize yourself with our policies and edit in other areas. —SpacemanSpiff 19:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of great gurjars

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that List of great gurjars, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 01:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Violation of topic ban issued under discretionary sanctions WP:GS/Caste. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 04:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Breach of topic ban

You were informed above, only days ago, that you are topic banned from contributions relating to the Gurjars. Why, then, did you just make this edit? Is there something that you do not understand about the concept of not being allowed to make contributions regarding a subject? - Sitush (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again, topic ban reset

Since you continued making serial edits in breach of your topic ban immediately after your latest block, I have blocked you again, for a period of ten days this time. In addition, the duration of your topic ban is hereby reset to three months counted from the end of this block, i.e. until the end of September. I strongly recommend that you should use those three months for making non-contentious edits in areas unrelated to your topic ban, in order to demonstrate that you are able and willing to collaborate constructively on this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]