User talk:Kunal Singh Solanki Nathawat
Welcome!
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Nathawat
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nathawat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —SpacemanSpiff 07:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nathawat
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nathawat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sitush (talk) 05:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit]
|
The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. |
—SpacemanSpiff 07:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.—SpacemanSpiff 14:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 14:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Solanki
[edit]I see you are at it again, inserting stuff about Solanki in inappropriate ways. You've been warned of your poor contributions in the past and you've had a sanctions alert as well as blocks. Each time you get blocked for this type of thing, the length is going to increase. Eventually, you will be indefinitely blocked. If it was me making the decision, I would probably do that now. Stop, please. - Sitush (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vadnagar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ghurid dynasty, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 16:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bhima II. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 16:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Move request reply
[edit]You can use Wikipedia:Move for requesting title change on the talk page for article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have reverted your move of Chaulukya dynasty. The talk page indicates that you do not have consensus for that and so you will have to follow the process at WP:RM. - Sitush (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Mori Rajputs
[edit]Please do not blank articles as you have just done at Mori Rajputs. If you think an article should be deleted then propose it as such. I did see your note on the article talk page but nothing except blatant copyright violation would justify blanking and even then there is a special template that we use so that the article does not in fact appear to be empty. Your talk page note is also pretty useless because you make claims but do not support them. - Sitush (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
More problems
[edit]This edit was a problem because (a) you didn't supply a source and (b) you still seem to be pushing your Solanki point of view for the Chaulukya dynasty. There was a similar issue regarding sourcing at Chandragupta II, Gautamiputra Satakarni etc on 6 April.
I notice that you were also reverted at Gahadavala. On that occasion you did provide sources but someone felt that they were not reliable. I can't comment any further about that because the source is not published in English but I do note that the reverter - utcursch - is an extremely experienced contributor to such articles. - Sitush (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Sitush. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of Rajputs seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
[edit]
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You have been topic banned for six months from editing all pages related to castes and social groups.
You have been sanctioned persistent disruptive editing, compare the warnings above. In particular, you have been adding back unsourced items at List of Rajputs, such as here, here and here, after it has been repeatedly explained to you that all additions must be sourced.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please go to WP:TBAN and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal against the ban, please say so below or on my talk page and I will explain how to do it. Bishonen | talk 20:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Rajputs. Sitush (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
@Bishonen:. They have come back and done the same thing again. - Sitush (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]Hi, Kunal Singh Solanki Nathawat. I see you have again restored the very same unsourced content to List of Rajputs that you were topic banned over in April 2017. Since you seem incapable or unwilling to abide by Wikipedia's rules no matter how often they're explained, I've blocked you indefinitely from editing here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 13:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC).