User talk:Kumarsaikat

Kumarsaikat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kumarsaikat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dwarka Nath Kanwarpal

The article Dwarka Nath Kanwarpal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet the WP:SOLDIER, as the Kirti Charkar (peacetime equivalent of MVC) is a second tier award and is awarded only once to the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoodino (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soumitra Bannerjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soumitra Bannerjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumitra Bannerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Setreis (talk) 06:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:List of celebrities who served in the Indian military has been nominated for deletion

Category:List of celebrities who served in the Indian military has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm GPL93. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Narbahadur Thapa seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 05:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suresh Chand Yadav, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashoka Chakra (military decoration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wing Commander.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kirti Chakra into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nungleppam Buddhimanta Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nungleppam Buddhimanta Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nungleppam Buddhimanta Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kartar Singh (soldier) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kartar Singh (soldier), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mahesh Kumar (soldier)

The article Mahesh Kumar (soldier) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A valiant serviceman, but does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajinder Kumar Sharma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Operation Vijay and Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santosh Mahadik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santosh Mahadik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jiggyziz^Talk✍️ 12:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Santosh Mahadik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Santosh Mahadik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jiggyziz^Talk✍️ 09:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santosh Mahadik (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Santosh Mahadik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Santosh Mahadik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 23:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Santosh Mahadik has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Santosh Mahadik. Thanks! Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 23:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|My account is not a sock puppet. How can you say that my account is a sock puppet. Why are you blocked my account and my created pages?}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My account is not a sock puppet. Why are you blocked my account and my created pages? Kumarsaikat (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]