User talk:Kumarjatji

{{delete}} User talk pages are not eligible for deletion. You are free to remove all content from this page other than declined unblock requests (and you don't have any of those!) if you wish. Note that accounts cannot be deleted. --Yamla (talk) 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Also note that Wikipedia can't be used as a source for itself. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 09:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But Sir I have given sources. Kumarjatji (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll repeat, Wikipedia can't be used as a source for itself.
Alivardi (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can see everyone's background or early life there. Kumarjatji (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are showing vandalism? Kumarjatji (talk) 09:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you misusing your position? Kumarjatji (talk) 09:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raja Hathi Singh Tomar(Kuntal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raja Hathi Singh Tomar(Kuntal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jatland.com/home/Raja_Hathi_Singh_Sonkh_-_Braj_Kesari. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GPL93 (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir I translate this page from hindi wikipedia Kumarjatji (talk) 13:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just translated Hindi Wikipedia into English and Kumarjatji (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's very possible that the Hindi Wikipedia article is also a copyright violation, so it's not really your fault. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir I,m want to left English Wikipedia Kumarjatji (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I,m being bullied Kumarjatji (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please permanently delete my English Wikipedia account. Sir Kumarjatji (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not possible. You are free to remove all current content from this page and simply stop using your account, though. Note that the sockpuppet investigation will continue regardless. --Yamla (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do this. Again, you are welcome to remove the current content of this page, but please do not remove content from elsewhere. That discussion must run its course and in any case, it is inappropriate for you to remove other people's comments. --Yamla (talk) 15:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]