User talk:Kuchipud

This is Kuchipud's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhurima Narla (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhurima Narla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 14:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kuchipud, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 14:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuchipud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is blocked citing using multiple accounts. I am using only this one account and not sure why this done. Please restore.

Decline reason:

A review of your deleted contributions makes it abundantly clear that you're either using multiple accounts, or have been coordinating with others to create the same article. —DoRD (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuchipud (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, you might be right that others in my organization that edit the same article. We are an organization that promote art and popular artists. There are multiple users that create and edit accounts. Not sure why this is a problem. Also my article was deleted citing Conflict of Interest. We have no conflict of interest here as we are set of people who promote artists of repute. We have no commercial interest in creating the page for this well known artist and not associated with her in any commercial form. Please restore

Decline reason:

You state that your purpose is promotion, and the nature of the editing that your group done that confirms that, as it was totally promotional. Since Wikipedia policy is that editing for promotion is not allowed, and since nothing you say suggests that you intend to do any other kind of editing, there is no reason to unblock you. Whether your editing was done for the purpose of making a profit or not is irrelevant. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please provide further information on your organisation in order that we may work to unblock your account and the accounts of others within your business (if appropriate). Nick (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. We are an organization called SiliconAndhra, a non-profit, non-political, non-religious cultural and community organization to promote arts, culture and artists. Please check our website at http://www.siliconandhra.org Kuchipud (talk) 21:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]