Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:
Inline citations throughout the article required for all claims, and especially at least one per paragraph.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Andersohn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Kubuflubu!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes(talk / cont)17:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Andersohn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- picture proof of the subject on band page: https://www.saeldessanc.com/ - the subject was not founder of the band, so i would see that as independent source
May i get these sources wrong, and may you can help what me with some information what makes them unvalid or non independent. Some of them have the requirement of not beeing only passing mentions, such as the newspaper article, where the subject's work is credited, or the book publication, which shows that the subject has contributed relevant material to the public of germany.
Also, the co works with german musicians and filmmakers are mentioned, which have at least relevance throughout the german art landscape and are also independent on the subject. And for the sake of the capturing of the german artist information on wikipedia, additional pages of the mentioned co workers (Ernst Horn, Saeldes Sanc, Movie "Black Nazi" etc.) should be made too after this one is finished.
Regarding the biographical facts, i'll trie to find another source than the CV, for i see that this source is not reliable due to the authorship of the subject himself.
I hope you can help me with improving this article to meet the standards.
