Peer Review

Great first draft of the article. I think the organization works really well, the subsections divide up the main sections for good flow. A few comments on specific sections:

Benefits of garden-based learning among children and youth: not sure if the colons are necessary in the sub-headings, I'd look this up in Wikipedia/look at what other articles do. Just a small formatting thing here

Keys to successful garden-based learning programs: I clicked on the external link and the page does not currently exist. Is there an updated page that has this information? I'm curious about the eight points; are the ones in the article copy and pasted from a website, or are they paraphrased?

Also take a second look at the formatting of the references section, I think something may have gone wrong here. Only the first source has a number, and the rest have "^" before the citation. This may be a formatting issue to fix.

Overall it looks good. There's a lot of detail and a wide range of information about garden-based learning. I'd suggest looking into a history section if there's information out there about who first started garden-based learning, and then you can connect that to how much it has grown since then. If you can find another picture it would be helpful to have a visual in the "benefits" section. --Mkh1206 (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]