User talk:Krustycheese

Krustycheese, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Krustycheese! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imperial and Royal Army (Austrian Empire) (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Imperial and Royal Army during the Napoleonic Wars. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imperial and Royal Army (Austrian Empire) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imperial and Royal Army (Austrian Empire), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imperial and Royal Army (Austrian Empire)

Hello, Krustycheese. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imperial and Royal Army".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Third Italian War of independence

Please stop to remove sources. If you disagree join the talk page. Sources says it is an Italian victory. The source that you added is about a battle won, not the entire war. Also remember that at the time of the armistice the Italians won at Bezzecca, so it may be a "initial" Austrian victory. You had to find reliable sources DavideVeloria88 (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was unjustly blocked, without anyone trying to get my side of the story. I did not, nor did i ever, use alt accounts to socket and there was no proper investigation if said account even matches my IP.

Unblocked

I have unblocked you because a technical analysis by one of our checkusers indicated that you were the victim of what we call a "joe job" - another user was intentionally impersonating you to frame you for sockpuppetry. For whatever it's worth, I'm sorry that you were blocked incorrectly. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts in António de Oliveira Salazar

Hi, could you please stop reverting improvements to the article? The statement is simply being attributed to the author to follow WP:NPOV and WP:WIKIVOICE guidelines, which state you should avoid stating opinions as facts and for example an article should not state that "genocide is an evil action", but it may state that "genocide has been described by John So-and-so as the epitome of human evil". Could you please self-revert? BeŻet (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]