User talk:Krmarshall

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Krmarshall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi there! Welcome, always happy to have a contributor to the Malazan pages. Please note that extended quotes are not really appropriate for wikipages, though references are definitely useful. If you would like some help with the reference or citation tags, I'd be glad to provide it. I took the opportunity to tweak the Races of the Malazan Book of the Fallen edits you made so they're in keeping with wikipedia policy and style, as well as the rest of the entries. WLU 20:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:The Lees of Laughter's End.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Lees of Laughter's End.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Lees of Laughter's End.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Lees of Laughter's End.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

Please note that quotes are not generally used in wikipedia pages. The sister project Wikiquotes is the preferred venue for extensive quotations. WLU 00:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the use of blockquotes to separate text is unusual and non-standard (see the manual of style for more info). Sub-headings are separated by the use of different levels of section headings, represented by increasing the number of equal signs which precede and follow section titles. WLU 01:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malazan stuff

There's a reply for you on my talk page (or will be shortly). I'm replying there so I know I've replied to all your questions.

Incidentally, if you're having trouble uploading a book cover, there are ways around - basically you can steal a book cover from Amazon and upload it, with a fair use rationale that allows you to only use the image on one page, the page of the book itself. That means you have to create the LoLE page before bots will stop deleting the image. WLU 10:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G'day,

I'm not sure what you were trying to do with this series of edits, but I suggest you work with tests and templates on a sub page rather than a mainspace page, and paste it to the mainspace once it is perfected.

Also, you may be making more work for yourself than you need - the Malazan template {{MBF}} placed on the bottom of each Malazan page contains much of the information you may be trying to add to the page. I'm not sure the difference between templates at the top of the page versus the bottom, but it's possible the template may be better placed at the top instead. If this is the case, a better solution may be to reshape and move the template rather than create a new one. WLU 14:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was it Kimloc that allowed the BB to ascend? I was quite sure it was Paran's blessing at the end of Memories of Ice. Kimloc allowed them to complete the song by returning to Raraku and fight in the battle with Fiddler, but I thought it was Paran's blessing that was responsible for their ascension as a group. I'll check up in The Bonehunters tonight if I remember. WLU 17:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a reply for you on my talk page. Also, it might be worth discussing which MBotF entries to create next - if the character is too minor, it could be sent to WP:AFD and get deleted; strategically it might be better to either use subpages or focus on the big characters first; Emancipor Reese in particular, I would say should be rolled into a page of minor characters, while Anomander Rake would be definitely worth his own page (and more fun to write). Also note that I've updated the Malazan template, and created a page for The Crippled God (after moving the old page to The Crippled God (novel)). WLU 17:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you didn't create the Mancy page. Well, it's there if you wanted to look at it. We could use the format there on other character pages, lead, description, history, appearances. Much like the Races page, minor characters could have a super-heading for each character, followed by several standard sub-headings. Also, could you have a look to make sure I got the character history right? I said he was from Saltoan, and I think I'm wrong. Plus I said he was addicted to heroin. Also not positive. WLU 18:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Careful...

Hi,

Just a note - be careful with the pages you create and the wikilinks you place. Generally redlilnks (uncreated articles) are put in only when you are about to create the article itself. Also, some of the redlinks you are creating are somewhat inapproprate in my mind. Creating pages for all the Houses in the Fatid won't work in my mind - there is not enough detail in the books to fill up these articles sufficiently, they'd be resigned to stub-hood for their entire existence. There are solutions, such as the one undertaken for the Races page. Also, Baudin shouldn't really have a page in my mind, since he's a relatively minor character appearing in small parts of only two books. Main pages are for big characters that take up large portions of the plot, and apear in many if not most of the books. Emancipor Reese is a similar example. Characters like these are better gathered into a 'Minor charactes of the MBotF' page, or into pages like The Bridgeburners, which should contain Quick Ben, Kalam, Whiskeyjack, Fiddler and all the other Bridgeburners. Paran deserves his own page, as does Apsalar I think. The reason I keep harping is to avoid a lot of unnecessary merging/deletion work and to try to ensure the pages end up of a high standard that is acceptable to most wikipedians. Fictional characters already lead a somewhat tenuous existence on wikipedia. But that's just my suggestions, and I do appreciate the effort to expand the pages, good job. WLU 16:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes to the info you left on my talk page, it's a possible structure and lead sentence for the High House Shadow page. Though which is better, to break up articles by House, or realm? The ideal goal is to have a structure that can draw multiple pages together in the most efficient way, that is sufficiently comprehensive that we don't need many exceptions. WLU 17:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff

I made some changes to the template, what do you think? {{MBF}} WLU 16:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a style point - if you type [[Cats]], it leads to a redirect, since the main article is found at [[Cat]]. You could type [[Cat|Cats]] to get to the page directly, but if you type [[Cat]]s, it gives you the same appearance, but you don't have to use a piped link (i.e. any letters after the closing brackets turn blue and become part of the wikilink). I bring this up because in this edit, you turned Ian Cameron Esselmont's into [[Ian Cameron Esselmont|Ian Cameron Esselmont's]], when all you needed was [[Ian Cameron Esselmont]]'s. Saves on typing.

Also, beware of overlinking. You don't need to link every instance of an author's name. The only time it's for sure that you link is the first instance in an article. After that, it's a judgement call, but every single time a name appears isn't necessary and is kinda frowned upon.

Final point, I tried to re-work the table of Warrens - what do you think? I tried to have the official name, alternate names and description. The last three entries (Fener, Forkrul Assail and Toblakai) didn't really work in this structure, so I just split them off of the table and kept them as text. Otherwise, their Warren's had no name, their other names were the race names, and the descriptions didn't really do anything. I tried to think of a way of having everything in one table but this was the best I could come up with. WLU 17:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm curious about your rational for this change (a reversion or undo of a previous edit)? My biggest objection would be the placement of information about Baudin in the Soldier section, though there's also the issue about the extra information for the characters (should be restricted to individuals in their roles as extra info for most of the characters is better placed in their own articles, without speculation) and the wording should be in keeping with WP:TONE. Any speculation that's not reliably sourced should be removed as per WP:NOT. Would you mind if I reverted/undid? WLU 17:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Note that copyright violations are taken very seriously on wikipedia - pasting text directly from websites that aren't GNU-compatible is a very bad thing. I've re-written the Toll the Hounds synopsis. Copyvios can result in blocks, text deletion and in extreme cases I think whole pages can get deleted. FYI. WLU 19:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiste characters

Good idea for organizing minor characters, also a good job on populating it. I moved the page to Tiste characters in the Malazan Book of the Fallen for two reasons. First, after the first letter, only proper names should be capitalized in page names and sections (i.e. characters rather than Characters). Second, since this is Wikipedia rather than the Malazan wiki, the titles should provide an adequate amount of context for readers. Unfortunately this means we have incredibly long names for the Malazan pages. The only thing I have concerns about would be characters who change allegiances in the series, but I can't think of any that have to date. Anyway, if we do run into problems, it's wikipedia, it can be changed. You might want to look into WP:POPUPS by the way, it makes correcting redirects much quicker and easier, among other things. I've been using it for months and find it very handy. Anyway, Tiste Characters is now found at Tiste characters in the Malazan Book of the Fallen. Why couldn't Erikson have picked a short title?

Brief notes? I took pages and read with a highlighter :) WLU 13:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the use of the <br> isn't necesary - a single blank line between pages ensures they are separated and start as new paragraphs. Also note that having two blank lines leaves more whitespace than on most other pages, and looks kinda weird to my eyes. I've also made a couple changes to the Tiste characters page - have a look. WLU 13:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Divination?

Regards MBF, is there a better superheading than Deck and Tiles? It's not particularly meaningful for a non-fan (something rife across all the MBF pages), any ideas for a higher heading? I was thinking Divination, but the DOD and ToH are far more than that since they link so closely with the Ascendants. WLU (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's always an option to put both under the same headings as ascendants (after creating it, since it's a missing section). Ascendants is one of the areas that is neglected on the page, particularly since Erikson's conception is pretty different from the conventional Gods of fantasy lit. The section would also neatly tie DoD and TotH together, perhaps all could be placed under magic... I can't think of a better solution, but if you do, I look forward to reading it. WLU (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad idea. I'm trying out a new {{MBF}} template, what do you think - it's here. I need help with the colours, a bit colour blind and not very good with them in general. WLU (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're looking now, I just changed it again. WLU (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

What do you think we should do for the MBF template? There's 2, you and Jeffsul seem to disagree over what's best, he likes the first new one, you like the 2nd (I think). Let me/us know your preference so we can sub in the new template, but use our/my talk pages please! The template testing page gets lost in my watchlist since I don't get the big orange box when it is changed.

I agree that MM and Otataral could be moved into the ME and magic pages respectively. Good suggestion on otataral, I hadn't thought of this. I'll post something similar on Jeffsul's page. WLU (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Numbers indicate number of characters added or removed as compared to the previous version. If someone corrects the inversion of two letters (i.e. from huose to house) the net result is 0. If you add a paragraph, it'll be an extra number of characters probably numbering in the hundreds to thousands. If said paragraph is then deleted, the same number will appear, but as a subtraction. WLU (talk) 13:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

De nada. I like answering questions, so feel free to drop them on my talk page at any point in time. WLU (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geh, I'm worried that the Malazan pages are going to turn into WP:CRUFT pages - it's somewhat tenuous to have so much detail on fictional entities on wikipedia and the more you can roll it into big pages, the better. I'll have a look at the page, but two of the big things you can do to legitemize pages like this are adding the MBF template and categories. WLU (talk) 15:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I read too quickly, I thought you had created a page for humans. Ignore my comment, I'd say this is legit (though still a bit crufty; for me the word isn't pejorative BTW, Sci-Fi and Fantasy fans tend towards crufty, and I include myself in this group). I'll review. I'm thankful for you and Jeff 'cause I spread my time pretty widely across wiki and it's nice to see that my 'pet' pages that I never seem to get around to expanding, have some dedicated contributors. WLU (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One point, review MOS:CAPS and MOS:TITLE - the only characters that should be capitalized in a title, either page or section, are proper names and the very first character. WLU (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second point - WP:ASR; don't say 'this page...' or 'will be dealt with below'; people will get to it eventually, or you can add a section link - # followed by the section title; [[#Humans]] for instance, would link on the RotMBF page to the Humans section (though make sure to pipe it, or the # will show up in the link. Check out the other MOS changes I've made. Sorry about the choppy feedback, I edit and reply as things catch my attention. WLU (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

99.99999% certain that it's first only. MOS:CAPS is the place to go for things like this. Another thing you might want to watch for - the sections are meant to hold information about the people you are describing, not the plot they are involved in (see WP:NOT#PLOT). I'm trimming a fair amount, you'll see in a second. WLU (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Three Gardens of the Moon.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Three Gardens of the Moon.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Three Gardens of the Moon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Three Gardens of the Moon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piss off BJBot, you waste of pixels. I've updated the fair use page for the image. I signed it myself, but you may want ot replace my sig. Usually, once I find a fair use rational that keeps the bots off my back, I just copy and paste it.

Great job by the way! The image is an excellent one in my mind, I love that it combines the three different cover images (even the horrible, horrible abortion of a US cover, what a bag of shit). Are you going to do the same for the other books? And is there any way I could convince you to do something similar for A Song of Ice and Fire? WLU (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MALAZ-Darujhistan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MALAZ-Darujhistan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure the image will survive fair use - you've got it labeled as a book cover, but it's not. I'm not sure what image use you could use, and I believe I've mentioned that I hate image use. WLU (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could ask about the page's copyright status at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. I'd ask, but I don't know enough of the details of the image - it's a scan? From one of the later editions?

Also quickly looking at the page, the titles you are choosing for the section are appropriate for a more 'poetic' venue, on wikipedia I'd chose much more neutral titles. WLU (talk) 13:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its the inside map, but with color done by a fan who claimed no rights to it. Found the template for the Book cover and just used it. Figured it had the same rationale. Krmarshall (talk) 16:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:MALAZ-Darujhistan.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:MALAZ-Darujhistan.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Adder-subtracter, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Mattie ^TK 20:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers

Fair enough, but then there should be a spoiler warning for the people who haven't read the whole series; I'm on Toll the Hounds, myself : )--Alexlykke (talk) 10:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any for a while, but didn't there use to be spoiler warnings on wikipedia?--Alexlykke (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Thanks for notifying me. I wouldn't want to go about spoiling the articles, now, would I? --Alexlykke (talk) 14:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tiles of the Hold

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tiles of the Hold, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A little less list-crufty than the article in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiles of the Hold to avoid getting WP:CSD#G4-speedied as recreation of previously deleted material, but still no demonstration of inclusion-worthiness to avoid getting deleted.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. – sgeureka ^t•c 13:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tiles of the Hold

I have nominated Tiles of the Hold, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiles of the Hold (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. – sgeureka ^t•c 11:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: Tiles of the Hold may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiles of the Hold (2nd nomination).

The faster you respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Tiles of the Hold: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

RE: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tiles_of_the_Hold_(2nd_nomination)

	Congratulations	from a Article Rescue Squad member
	Congratulations Krmarshall your article was saved in an Articles for deletion debate.travb (talk) 21:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: your message

Thank you for your nice comments, with no references, I am shocked the article actually survived. I would prepare for another Article for Deletion in the future and find references. travb (talk)

Races of the MBotF

I'm going to divide the Races into five separate pages: the Forkrul Assail, Jaghut, K'Chain Che'Malle, T'lan Imass, and The Tiste. I get the feeling there will be objections, but I think they need/deserve it. Can I count on your support? Alan16 (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three pages sounds like a good idea. And the titles are long, but there isn't a lot that can be done about them. I'll make a start soon. Alan16 (talk) 08:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to publish the articles today/tonight, and I was wondering what you think should happen to the other articles. For example, the Tiste characters page isn't really necessary as it will be basically copied into the new one, so really it should basically be deleted or redirected to the new page. I'm not sure what/how to do that, so any help would be good. I'll drop you a line when I'm finished writing. Should be in a couple of hours. Alan16 (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the page Foreign Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen series. I thought this was a better title than Tiste... because it allowed the inclusion of the Elient. Alan16 (talk) 00:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm going to wait and see what the response to the article is. If it's good/neutral/non-existent then I'll create the other two. I also decided that it would be a good idea to do some redirections, so: Tiste Edur, Tiste Liosan, Tiste Andii, The Tiste, and The Elient, should all go to Foreign Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen series.

Also, because I thought about the name change after I had written the Tiste Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen, I redirected that. And finally, when I did the rewrite first time, I spelt foreign as foriegn. So I've redirected the page Foriegn Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen series as well. So that is quite a few links, and they all should go to the same place.

I'd be interested in your opinions on the article. Alan16 (talk) 01:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All three pages are up and running: Human Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen series, Foreign Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen series, and Founding Races from the Malazan Book of the Fallen. I have also proposed Races of the Malazan Book of the Fallen for deletion because it is now irrelevant. Support would be useful. Thanks. Alan16 ^talk 23:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well when you have time, have a look over the new pages and tell me what you think. The deletion thing is finished now. We decided to turn it into a disambig page. Thanks. Alan16 ^talk 13:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Patrick's Catholic Church (Council Bluffs, Iowa) (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.stpatrickscb.org/about-us/history. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:St. Patrick's Catholic Church (Council Bluffs, Iowa) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 14:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Krmarshall, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 14:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St. Patrick's Catholic Church (Council Bluffs, Iowa)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St. Patrick's Catholic Church (Council Bluffs, Iowa) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.stpatrickscb.org/about-us/history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 333 -blue 14:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Krmarshall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]