User talk:Krinixt

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fast fashion, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Dakota (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lex Dakota and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 04:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krinixt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 04:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Dakota (December 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Aviram7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The Submission seem like as promotion of the person and this subject is non-notable topic they don't meets WP:NBIO and WP:GNG and some source are Instagram, wikibio and other social sites.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lex Dakota

Hello, Krinixt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lex Dakota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]