User talk:KravitzSchwarz

KravitzSchwarz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KravitzSchwarz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald Schwarz (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerald Schwarz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 12:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald Schwarz (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha Monarch was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerald Schwarz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

♔ MONARCH ^{Ask me} 04:12, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gerald Schwarz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gerald Schwarz. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald Schwarz has been accepted

Gerald Schwarz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerald Schwarz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proof. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

KravitzSchwarz (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

There is an insert at the top of the article that indicates more references are needed to substantiate claims. But, every claim is referenced, so I don't know where the problem lies. Can you please assist?

Please note that at one time (... following many edits, made in response to the same directive), the article had no inserts.. That is, an earlier insert requesting verification had been removed after the issues were addressed). So, I presumed the article had been accepted without further conditions. But, the insert reappeared. Thanks for your help. Regards, Margery

It would appear the reviewer believes the references are insufficient, and more independent sources are needed. See WP:42, WP:REFBEGIN, and WP:RS. Also, it appears you have a WP:COI, editing about someone you know is not recommended. -- Kethrus |talk to me 12:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gerald Schwarz.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Gerald Schwarz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://people.brandeis.edu/~schwarz/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

KravitzSchwarz (talk) 13:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Hello,[reply]

The article on Gerald Schwarz has the word "who" placed in brackets after the name of an individual cited in the article: "the couple fled to England where Gerald's older brother, Maurice[who?], was born..." I believe that question has been answered. If you believe that the question has been answered, is it possible to have the word "who" removed from the article? Thanks, Margery

Done. For future reference, I have two suggestions. First, when you have a question about a specific article, you should post your question on the article's talk page so more people can see it. Second, if it's a small change (like clarifying a {{who}}, you can be BOLD and just remove it yourself. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]