User talk:Kpillai856

Welcome!

Hello, Kpillai856, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Astra (missile) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. —Gazoth (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indian Air Force, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 14:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to TU 142 Aircraft Museum

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, TU 142 Aircraft Museum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Amazon Air

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Amazon Air, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

N Ramakrishnan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, N Ramakrishnan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:N Ramakrishnan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:N Ramakrishnan. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N Ramakrishnan (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough notability demonstrated, see WP:POLITICIAN. Also see WP:MEMORIAL. Some claims are original research and not cited, see WP:NOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N Ramakrishnan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:N Ramakrishnan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kpillai856! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Stevey7788 (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navath Ramakrishnan has been accepted

Navath Ramakrishnan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nosebagbear (talk) 22:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already there!

Hi there,

The green banner above means that the draft you submitted Navath Ramakrishnan (you titled it N Ramakrishnan) was accepted. I re-reviewed it and felt it of sufficient quality to be added to Wikipedia.

It hasn't yet been "patrolled" - this is a check of every new article. People searching within Wikipedia can find your article, but it won't show up in google searches until it is. Like us, they have a bit of a backlog at the moment, so I can't say how long that will take, but they're usually reasonably quick.

The advice was WP:MEMORIAL - a reminder that you don't "own" the page - negative information should be added not avoided and other editors are free to make changes you may disagree with.

In any case - congrats on getting it into Wikipedia. The system will send you a notification of when it is patrolled. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]