User talk:KoshVorlon/Archive 22
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:KoshVorlon. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
ANI
No. You can say "shows a pattern" all you like, but "these edits are a bit troubling" says nothing at all. No explanation, no context--whose pattern? Pattern of what? Drmies (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
My response
The vast majority of the material on the talk page for "Chinese Room" [[1]] is not cited. Nn9888 (talk) 03:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
GregJackP
Do not remove or edit other people's posts such as you did on the above's talk page. A retired editor is entitled to display their opinions, regardless of whether you agree with them or not. You will continue to be reverted despite any pointy essay you link to. Thank you. CassiantoTalk 16:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- In UploadWizard, the dialog to see an image preview has been removed. You already see the images in the thumbnails when you upload them. [2]
- UploadWizard dialogs look a bit different now. They have been updated to the new OOUI look. [3]
- You can now edit music scores in VisualEditor. You can add new sheet music scores and get live updates when you edit one. [4]
- When you send an e-mail to another editor using Special:EmailUser, that user will now get a notification on the wiki as well. [5]
- You can now see 500 images when you upload images from Flickr with UploadWizard. Before this change the limit was 50. [6]
- The Wikimedia mailing lists have been upgraded. [7]
- MediaWiki developers spent a day looking at proposed code changes in Gerrit. The goal was to clean up the backlog and give feedback to volunteer developers. [8]
Problems
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from September 29. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from September 30. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 1 (calendar).
- There will be a new beta feature that allows editors to use Flow on their user talkpage if they want to. Each wiki can decide if they want to enable it. [11]
- The Content Translation tool can give translation suggestions. This feature will now be available in more languages: English, French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Turkish, Japanese, Italian, and Catalan. [12]
Meetings
- You can join the strategy process of the Reading department of Wikimedia Engineering. [13]
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on 29 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The Wikimedia Foundation developers want the community to decide who can use OAuth in the future. You can discuss it on Meta.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
| Don't template the regulars |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC) |
Blocked
I have blocked you for 48 hours for this edit, specifically for continuing an edit war, and for misrepresenting the consensus at AN, which was clear that this was a non-issue and that you should move on and do something else. As you probably already know, you can use the {{unblock}} template to appeal this block. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
No, I represented consensus correctly - after all , that was the consensus on ANI. No problems though, I'll wait the 48 hours. KoshVorlon 17:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Just for the record, that doesn't mean you can carry on in 48 hours' time, it means you need to leave the issue alone. If you remove that content again after the block expires, you'll be re-blocked for as long as is necessary to prevent continued disruption. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
It is beyond me how you can look at a discussion where out of the 6 people who responded 0 agreed with you and see a consensus that you are right. You say "I represented consensus correctly - after all , that was the consensus on ANI", can you please explain how this can be reconciled with the discussion on ANI? HighInBC (was Chillum) 18:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
HighInBC We're talking about two different things | this is where I state I represented consensus, which was that GregJackP's polemic posting was allowed to stay so I changed WP:Polemic accordingly. The edit on GregJackP's page is supported by WP:Polemic itself, but not supported on AN, sadly. KoshVorlon 19:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Your edit to WP:Polemic is hardly any better. It was pointed disruption.
Let me be 100% clear, I think the content of the page is in violation of our talk page policies. However when I saw an edit war going on at the page of a retired editor I did not protect my preferred version, rather I immediately put up a warning to stop. You see once it is clear there is disagreement about the interpretation of policy it is not for any one person to force a decision.
The community talked it out and decided the content was okay. That does not mean we change policy to reflect a single incident. The community always has the final say in these matters, going against your interpretation of policy does not invalidate the policy and it does not mean we have to change it.
Now that the community has come to a consensus on this matter I have to accept the version that I do not prefer, and so do you. It was good you went to the community for their opinion on the matter, now you have it. Accept it and move on. HighInBC (was Chillum) 19:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- I hear you loud and clear, however, that policy was made a policy by consensus, and it should be carried out as written, the only way it can not be carried out is it further consensus changes it. I know you won't agree with me, trust me, I read what you wrote repeatedly, therein lies our disagreement, I believe policy should be enforced as written, except that consensus changes that same policy to permit a different outcome, apparently you and others (I'm not making this a "you " thing, because it clearly isn't) believe that exceptions can be added in without changing the policy, due to the will of the community, don't worry, I get it loud and clear. KoshVorlon 10:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey Kosh. There are so many issue with that statement that I felt it important to drop by.
- policy should be enforced as written - from a high level WP:POLEMIC is a guideline and WP:NOTBURO is policy. The principle is what matters, not exact wording of the rules. Disputes are solved by discussion, not strict adherence to the rules. Does that make sense? The "rules" are just a description of what's happened before and likely will happen again... generally the right thing to do, but not be followed blindly. No matter whether you're right or wrong on the underlying issue, not understanding this fundamental principle is the reason you are blocked.
- So, on to the underlying issue. Is the content on GregJackP's page in violation of POLEMIC? Honestly, I'd say no. POLEMIC in bold refers to Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing. Is what he's saying offensive? Barely. Very divisive? Not really. AND it's related to encyclopedic editing. It just doesn't fit in that section. It's not targeted at individuals or a specific group, let alone attacking or vilifying them. It's not a pre-meditated nasty attack, it's a person ranting on their way out the door. I don't agree with a word of it, but it's important to let people express themselves in situations like that.
This way of thinking is fundamental to Wikipedia, it's why IAR exists. WormTT(talk) 11:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- I realize you probably don't particularly want to hear my opinion on this, so I'll be brief: Your insistence on adhering strictly to the letter of "the rules" as you understand them has been a consistent source of conflict and problems for you the entire time you have been editing here. You need to loosen up and try and understand that the spirit of the rules is what is important and that all rules, every single one of them not only on Wikipedia but in the real world, are subject to exceptions. just some free advice to take or leave as you please. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I strongly agree with the points made by our colleagues above. IAR is a subtle but critical part of the 'pedia. It can be hard to get one's head around, but it is a liberating and, one of the wiser guidelines on WP. I would say, be more flexible, malleable in terms of the art of the possible on this. It is one of the few policies which genuinely makes us "free". Regards, Simon aka Irondome (talk) 01:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The link editor in the visual editor now shows results below the search box. This improves the usability on desktop and mobile. [14]
- The description at Special:ChangeEmail now clearly explains that the page can also be used to remove your email. [15]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 6. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 7. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 8 (calendar).
- UploadWizard will remind users to add a category. [16]
- UploadWizard's category selectors will be easier to use. [17]
- A new Cite error will be shown if a named reference is defined more than once in the same article. [18]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Wikidata requests your input on how to improve the editing of Wikidata's data in other locations, such as Wikipedias.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
AN
Hi, you wrote "What do you plan to do to address the concerns raised at the topic ban discussion?" in the appeal section where I posted. Sorry, I cannot understand the meaning of the question. Can you please tell me clearly. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 10:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The database size lists have been updated. These control special page update frequency and which wikis use global abuse filters. [19]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 13. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 14. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 15 (calendar).
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons using the visual editor. When the image is uploaded it will be added to the article you're editing. [20]
- Pages that show citation error messages will automatically be placed in a hidden category. [21]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Tech News is trying to make reading the newsletter easier. The
icon means the item is in the newsletter every week, but with new dates. The 
icon means the item is mainly relevant for readers with technical knowledge. You can leave feedback on this change. - Timestamps in the protection log will now be in the user's timezone. Previously they would show Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). [22]
Problems
- A problem with MediaWiki made some pages show no content on October 14. This has now been fixed. [23]
- Some templates were misplaced in the Flow description bar. This could make it impossible to click on links. This will be fixed this week. [24]
- The deployment of the new MediaWiki version was stopped on October 14. No new code was deployed for the rest of week. This meant planned changes did not happen. [25]
Changes this week
- Changes that were planned to happen last week will happen this week. [26]
- Wikispecies, Meta and MediaWiki.org will be able to use Wikidata for sitelinks. [27][28][29][30]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello KoshVorlon, will you be so kind to look at above and can you did it? I can't...Thanks in advance and best regards -- Sweepy (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Scientology
Rather than looking for "scientologists", I suggest you read (for instance) Wikipedia:Wikipediholic, Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder, Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors or fr:Catégorie:Utilisateur perfectionniste :-) Oh, and also Wikipedia:Don't cry COI. Apokrif (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 27. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 28. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 29 (calendar).- The first time you use the visual editor, pop-ups will explain why and when you should use the citation and link tools. [31]
- You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons from inside the wikitext editor by clicking "Upload" in the "Insert file" dialog. You will also be able to drag and drop them into an article when using the visual editor. [32][33]
- When you edit a code block in visual editor, you will have the syntax highlighted. [34][35]
- Index and Page namespaces on Wikisource will be defined as content namespaces in
$wgContentNamespaces. [36]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see how many editors are using a gadget on a wiki on Special:GadgetUsage. [37]
- If you are using the mobile version of Wikipedia, you can now see Wikidata descriptions under article titles in search results. [38]
- Editing conflicts are now detected when you edit on a mobile device. Before, this did not work properly on mobile. [39]
Problems
- On October 26 the Wikimedia sites went down for ten minutes. [40]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 3. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 4. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 5 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join. You can also read the latest VisualEditor newsletter.
Future changes
- A help link will be added to Special:Search. Administrators might have to update the MediaWiki:Search-summary message to avoid two help links. [41]
- Empty list items could be allowed in the future. If so, this could affect some templates. [42]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Your restoration of a sock post
I assume you're unfamiliar with Vote (X) for Change who will toss out random accusations against admins who have blocked his IPs and editors who have reported his socking? --NeilN talk to me 18:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
mail call
Dropped you a line WormTT(talk) 13:48, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Historic districts on NRHP
Since you previously commented on this subject, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Category:Historic Districts on the National Register of Historic Places by state. Thanks Hmains (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Superprotect has been removed. [43]
- You can now switch between the wikitext editor and the visual editor without saving. You will not lose the changes you have made. [44]
- JSON dumps of the production search indexes are now available. They can be imported to Elasticsearch. [45]
Problems
- Some translations for the Thanks and Echo extensions were missing. Translators have been asked to help and this should be solved soon. [46]
Changes this week
- Thumbnails of 16-bit TIFF files will be displayed properly. Before, this didn't work. [47]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11. It will be on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- A new tool to navigate through diff pages is being developed. You can test it out and give feedback. [48]
- The options on Special:Watchlist will look slightly different. [49]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Heathenry
Hello there Kosh. Just to let you know, I responded to your comments over at the discussion regarding disruptive behaviour on Heathenry themed articles, explaining where I feel that some of your points aren't supported by the evidence at hand. If you have a chance, do take a look and it would be good for the discussion if you could let me know if you had any counter-points to my own. Of course, I have to admit that I am obviously trying to convince you to change your opinion in that debate - but it is nothing personal! Regards, Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)