User talk:Koonjo28

If you are a troll, go away.

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be anything but. For more information on this, see

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!

May 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Heimstern. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 21:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to continue to disruptive editing of Juro, as you did to Slovak koruna, please note that he has been banned and the same can happen to you.
Dove1950 22:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

— Mike Gogulski^{↗C•@•T↗} 22:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You're blocked, as an apparent sock of User:Juro. (If I have misunderstood, please explain.)

I had a look at your edit history. You seem to like arguments and deletions. Deletions: For example, your alteration of "Bratislava (Pressburg)" to "Bratislava" would make good sense in a 21st century context; it doesn't seem to make any sense in an 18th century context. Have you made a single constructive edit? If so, do please point it out. -- Hoary 09:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Koonjo28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This disruptive block is harassment and abuse of administrative powers. I don't even know who this Juro person is I'm a new user who made some test edits to try out wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Your contribs make it obvious you are a sockpuppet of Juro. —dgies^t_c 05:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.