User talk:Komalgupta2003

Welcome!

Hello, Komalgupta2003, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Mu Sigma Inc. does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Mu Sigma Inc.. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mu Sigma Inc.

You should read WP:OSE. Yes, some other companies have pages with promotional material, unfortunately, but that is no excuse for you to add that to Mu Sigma Inc.. Once again, please remember that Wikipedia is not a place for promoting your company. Nobody is denying that Mu Sigma has won or been nominated for many awards, but Wikipedia is not a trophy case, and Wikipedia is not a place for press-releases. Grayfell (talk) 05:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest moving this discussion to Talk:Mu Sigma Inc., that way it is easier for other editors to find and follow. If you would like something specific to look over, I would recommend the list of good articles on economics and business. These have all been recognized as being above average articles. Hopefully they will be useful to you for comparison.Grayfell (talk) 06:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mu Sigma Inc.. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 21:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reverting back to old data for OnMobile wiki

Re your message: I reverted your changes because you removed a lot of cited material and replaced it with uncited material. If there is a particular product line that OnMobile no longer provides, then that particular line should be removed, not the entire lead paragraph. The citations establish the company's notability and need to remain in the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits again because upon closer inspection of the sentences you added, you copied them OnMobile press releases. Such copying is a copyright violation and is not allowed, so please do not copy material from OnMobile again.

As I told you in my previous message, if there is a certain product line that OnMobile no longer sells, then you need to remove that specific product line, not the entire sentence with copied material. For example, if OnMobile were to stop providing phone backup service then only "phone backup" would need to be removed.

As for the Arvind Rao information, while that was an older and negative, it should not be removed because it is a properly sourced. Negative issues are not removed just because they are negative as long as they are properly sourced. Past history is also not removed because the article is supposed to cover the entire history of the company, not just the current status of the company. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]