User talk:Kolemannlutz

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mars University has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mars University was changed by Kolemannlutz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959832 on 2020-11-16T22:36:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mars University

It was incredibly inappropriate of you to overwrite the existing content of Mars University (the Futurama episode) with other content about an unrelated subject without making any clear effort to garner a consensus to do so. If you do so again I will consider it an act of willful vandalism on your part. If you sincerely wish to move the Futurama article to make way for an article about Mars University, that may be appropriate. DonIago (talk) 03:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kolemannlutz. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kolemannlutz. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kolemannlutz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kolemann Lutz

Hello, Kolemannlutz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Vermont, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kolemann Lutz, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolemann Lutz.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vermont}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 01:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kolemann Lutz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kolemann Lutz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mori Calliope fan talk 02:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]