User talk:Koko Nigel

April 2014

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Indesit, with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Input on image decision

Hi you are invited to vote for the image to be used on the LG G2 infobox page at Talk:LG G2. Thanks! GadgetsGuy (talk) 06:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pet Shop Story crossbreed chart

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pet Shop Story crossbreed chart, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 04:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Hazmat2. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thrianta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 06:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Thrianta rabbit on hay.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Thrianta rabbit on hay.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 06:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Thrianta rabbit on hay.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Thrianta rabbit on hay.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 06:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Polish rabbit Broken.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Polish rabbit Broken.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Polish rabbit Harlequin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Polish rabbit Harlequin.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bumblebee toad.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bumblebee toad.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southern toad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Hyla leucophyllata.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Hyla leucophyllata.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Male Derbyan parakeet in captivity.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Male Derbyan parakeet in captivity.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Green anoles kept with common house gecko.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Green anoles kept with common house gecko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 03:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blue-tailed Skink (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Blue-tailed Skink (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Majora4 (leave a message) 04:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lord Derby's parakeet, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page move cleanup

I noticed that you moved a page. I think there is a problem that should be cleaned up: please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive268#Page move cleanup. The problem is that the original article has effectively been lost as it now a new article about a different topic. Johnuniq (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that text must not be copied from other sources into Wikipedia because that is almost always a copyright violation. Material at Wikipedia must be written by the editor adding the text, and must be based on reliable sources. See WP:C and WP:V. Johnuniq (talk) 05:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salamanders as pets

The article Salamanders as pets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a 'how to'. This article is an essay or Original research. Unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salamanders as pets

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Salamanders as pets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://animals.pawnation.com/create-perfect-salamander-habitat-11640.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Your addition to Bibron's gecko has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Johnuniq (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Blue-tailed skink, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Insanity Incarnate^Talk 00:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skink articles

Can you give me a clear picture of what is going on with all your page moves and redirects in several Skink articles, please? Best, -- Sam ^Sing! 01:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your redirection of Blue-tailed Skink to the DAB page you created at Blue-tailed Skink (disambiguation). Cryptoblepharus egeriae is not one of the three entries on the DAB page. What is your intention here? Please start communicating. Thanks. -- Sam ^Sing! 01:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to get a reply to the above questions? -- Sam ^Sing! 08:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you happily keep on editing including recreation of Care for skinks with the odd string of text "Move this page" instead of communicating? Care for skinks was deleted just a few hours ago under G3. -- Sam ^Sing! 09:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop and talk for a minute? Your recent creation of Blue-Tailed Rainbow Skink is yet another title that goes against the policy in WP:TITLEFORMAT. -- Sam ^Sing! 10:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Care for skinks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Haminoon (talk) 09:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Hi Koko. Please stop editing, moving, or creating articles about skinks, lizards, and salamanders until you have explained what you are trying to do. We can probably help you but if you do not respond we may have to block you for a short while until we understand how you ae tring to improve these articles. One thing is for sure, you must not copy text from other wesites - that can get you blocked very quickly. Looking forward to hearing from you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: I wondered if blanking this talk page and putting a single, simple message might get any attention. I noticed some of the problems and have reverted copyright violations a couple of times. However I don't think anyone has got a response. The last copyvio was less than an hour ago (see next section—I would have taken more trouble writing it if I thought it would be read). Johnuniq (talk) 06:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! 01:59 PM, January 26 2015 (PoloTime)

Copyright violation

Another copyright violation at Tiger salamander:

Please see my other comments above. Johnuniq (talk) 06:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAY NOTO Kudpung!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Category:Pet Turtles

Category:Pet Turtles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC) --Koko Nigel (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Koko Nigel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because I wanted to edit all my projects

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 08:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Koko Nigel this is only a very short block. When it expires you are welcome to continue editing but if you make any further inappropriate or disruptive edits you may risk being blocked indefinitely. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Da hell...?

Care to explain this? This is not clown time. I see your are blocked so maybe this is all moot? Herostratus (talk) 03:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Little Match Girl, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Herostratus (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Spur-thighed tortoise, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 02:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You have clearly been copying text from other websites, both under this user name and without signing in.[1][2][3] Do not copy text from sites or articles. You have made numerous contentious page moves, without discussion. Do not move articles without discussing the issue first. You have made unsourced, inexplicable or otherwise disruptive changes to numerous articles. If you do not understand the warnings you have received on this talk page, ask for assistance before editing again. If you continue any of these behaviors, you will be blocked from editing, likely permanently. SummerPhD (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The more I look, the more instances of copied text I find. As some of them have minor changes that make it a bit harder to find them, I am reverting all unsourced additions of blocks of text I find that you have made. If any of the additions were not copyright violations, feel free to restore them with a citation to a reliable source. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A situation you were involved with is being discussed at the Administrators' Noticeboard. Please comment. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Koko Nigel, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Shirt58 (talk) 09:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]