User talk:Knucklecracker7/Attribution (psychology)

Peer Review

Hello, I attend Pitt-Greensburg and I am here to peer review your article, I personally like how you provide the multiple examples for the internal and external aspects, and how much information is input into the research and your sandbox itself.Jerome0118 (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I liked how you split the internal and external aspects into the their own section and gave multiple examples on both of these aspects. It helped me better understand the theory better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudge10 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I loved how detailed your guys' page is so far! You have a lot of great information here. My only suggestion is to include some information on the founding father(s) of your theory. Great job guys! Lda12 (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback! We added some additional information on Fritz Heider and Bernard Weiner, and we plan to add it to the main page. -Accountname43 (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like the different examples that are provided as they give a detailed explanation of what the theory is. I think some more detailed information on the origins of the theory would help as well.

04noodle (talk) 19:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Knucklecracker7/Attribution (psychology)/Emiann1x1 Peer Review

I believe there could be more expansion with recent research on COVID-19 mask wearing policies and attribution theory. Internal attribution theory would probably be the best fit. The example in the article for the Internal Attribution is about someone not wearing their hearing-aid, as they believe it is bad for them. This could be expanded into people who had the same mindset during the pandemic, in how they believed they could get "poisoning" by having to wear the mask all day.

I'm sure they have research from the last couple years and how people either did or didn't wear their mask based on Attribution theory. So I think it's good to include that in your sandbox draft as something to help work on! Emiann1x1 (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. We went back and added additional information on two of our founding theorists and plan to add more on a third theorist Harold Kelley. Knucklecracker7 (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm from Pitt-Greensburg5 and I'm supposed to peer review your page.

I think this page has a lot of information that is explained well. I like how you touched base on covid. like how you split the internal and external aspects into their own section and gave multiple examples for the internal and external aspects into their own section and gave examples for the internal and external aspects. I do believe that there could be more information on the recent research on covid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudge10 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hello, I just left a peer review for your theory, check it out. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Knucklecracker7/Attribution_%28psychology%29/Slayage_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review

Slayage (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]