User talk:Knubedexercise

Recent edits to Kyungpook National University

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Technopat (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kyungpook National University has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kyungpook National University was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://asianhistory.about.com/od/southkorea/p/Park-Chung-Hee-Biography.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kyungpook national university

Hello, Knubedexercise, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Kyungpook national university, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Kyungpook National University. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

a link to the article you copied from
the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Daegu, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Daegu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eye snore Summer! (PC) 05:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your question

I will just answer your question to keep our conversation short.

I lived in Republic of Korea for 15 years before immigrating to the United States for the undergraduate and post-graduate medical education. To be exact, I was born and raised in Seoul (Hannam-dong) for 2 years; lived in Daegu/Gumi (Suseong-gu, Geosan-3 dong) for 8 years; and lived in Seongnam (Bundang-gu, Seohyeon-2 dong) for 3 years. Therefore, I can speak, read and write in Korean in a partially fluent manner.

First of all, I want to clarify (and want you to know) that a statement that is "unsubstantiated" or "unverified" in an encyclopedic setting is a statement that is not cited or does not have a supporting source. Obviously, you failed to cite your sources for the statements that you made. Without any supporting (or cited) source , your statements are either your opinions or plagiarized from other sources that you failed to list in reference. Make no mistake, I am not calling you a liar. If I made you perceive that way, I am sorry for doing so.

Second of all, I do not think I mentioned that there is no conservative party established in the city. Where in the article did I mention that there is no conservative party in Daegu? Please refrain from just assuming things, just like you did several times in your message.

Third of all, I have an issue with your third sentence: "The first relevant information discussed is the 2003 Jungangro Subway Fire." What is your source for this sentence? AGAIN! You are clearly being subjective in an objective setting. For me, the "first relevant information" regarding Daegu is its location in South Korea. For others, the "first relevant information" may be something else; for example, Samsung Lions, Seomun sijang, and other relevant things in Daegu.

Fourth of all, I notice your antipathy towards Daegu, as you have repeatedly pinpointed only negative aspects of Daegu not only in its page, but also in another unrelated wikipedia page. Of course, a wikipedia page should not be a promotional pamphlet (as you mentioned); however, a wikipedia should also not be a place where you can vent your personal opinions (they belong on an editorial section of a newspaper or a blog). If that's what you call a "truthful journalism," why don't you return the favor to other cities in South Korea? Why only Daegu?? Bashing Daegu and its related constituents repeatedly without referenced source in an unrelated page does not constitute a so-called truthful journalism. Based on your contribution history (of including derogatory statements regarding Daegu and its related pages), your edits seem more like a poor, immature effort at expressing your hatred and pejorative attitude towards for things you don't like. If you want your view to be respected by your readers, then remain objective and be subjective in an appropriate setting.

Almost all the things that you posted are derogatory remarks that aren't supported by concrete facts (or cited sources). I list down several examples, excluding the subway fire incident:

- "In Daegu, Korean food overwhelmingly dominates; Chinese, Japanese and Western food taste nothing as good as they would if they were cooked correctly."

- "My son has a white-skinned English teacher."

- "It attracts students exclusively from Daegu and immediate surrounding regions"

If you actually held an objective stance and refrained from only nitpicking denigrating remarks regarding Daegu and other entities, I wouldn't have done anything to your changes. W

Fifth of all, 새누리당 is not a ULTRA-conservative party; objectively, it is a conservative party composed of liberal conservatives, moderate conservatives, and radical conservatives. Just because 새누리당 isn't 민주당 or 진보통합당, it doesn't mean that it is ultra-conservative; they MAY be liberal conservative or moderate conservatives for God's sake. So here again, you infuse your personal opinion in an encyclopedic setting. By the way, do you think it would be appropriate for me to write that Gwangju and other Jeolla area are THE hotbed of ultra-radical-liberals when its population may be moderate liberals or conservative liberals?? No, right?? Same applies to Daegu and 새누리당. Think before you write.

Sixth of all, I am not here to write wikipedia entries. Maybe I will write something in the future.. Who knows? I just wanted to eliminate statements that are not appropriate for encyclopedic purposes. As so many other users have mentioned/noted in your page as well as in revision history sites, your type of writing does not belong here; it is more suitable for an editorial, a school report, or a blog (which I am sure you will excel at).

Seventh of all, Kyungpook National University may not be one of THE best universities in Republic of Korea (like SKY, Hanyang, Sungdae, Sogang-dae), but it still bears significant reputation in South Korea as much as that of other in-Seoul universities. Statistically speaking, KNU may AT WORST be a top-20 school out of hundreds of universities in ROK (http://search.naver.com/search.naver?where=nexearch&query=%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD+%EB%8C%80%ED%95%99%EA%B5%90+%EC%88%9C%EC%9C%84&sm=top_sug.pre&fbm=1&acr=1&acq=%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD+%EB%8C%80%ED%95%99&qdt=0&ie=utf8), and it still will be at least a 90th percentile school in Korea. Therefore, you can say that it is one of the leading universities in Korea. Schools like Stanford, Johns Hopkins, MIT, Caltech, UChicago, Columbia, etc.. are internationally known as leading universities in the WORLD even though they are not the best schools in the US (since HYP are the perennial top-3 in the States, check US NEWS and WORLD REPORT rankings). School doesn't need to be the best to be one of the leading universities in a country, but it needs to be at least above a certain percentile to be considered one. By the way, Seoul itself doesn't not 3000 colleges as you previously mentioned. I lived in Seoul and have been there often, but I do not think Seoul is that big to contain 3000 colleges. You need to refine your research skills.

Eighth of all, you are ridiculous. "However, it appears your method is to omit and delete relevant information, especially unflattering, in defense of your employers." Do you have any proof that I was hired by someone to edit things? Do you know my employers? Do you know where I live? Do you know where I studied? Well, no, right? So stop assuming things like you have done profusely, because you clearly are wrong. In fact, I currently live in the US, am a naturalized citizen of the US, and am an alumni of a HYPSM school (and a 2nd year medical student). If you really need to know my alma mater, check US News and World Report College Rankings (ranked #4) and Medical School Rankings (Ranked #3). You will get the idea that I don't truly care about how KNU; however, I do care about objective pages being edited by someone who cannot hold a neutral ground. I don't know where and what you studied, but it truly feels like I am wasting my time discussing with a person like you. I hope I do not get patients like you when I start practicing medicine.

Ninth of all, you need to re-learn your grammar if you want to practice so-called "truthful journalism". There are so many errors in your entries that it is not even funny. I am sincerely concerned that Wikipedia doesn't check for spellings and grammars before accepting changes to its pages.

Well, I will just stop here since I need to review micropathology and other subjects for the upcoming Step-1 exam (if you know what that even means). I hope you enjoy this long message. If you read carefully, I clearly answered all of your questions. :)

Slee250 (talk) 06:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Daegu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]