User talk:Kntripp

Welcome!

Hello, Kntripp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

We don't use Wikipedia as a reference

Hello Kntripp, Thank you for your efforts to improve UAA/APU Consortium Library by adding a reference. Unfortunately I've had to remove it because we don't use Wikipedia as a source. This is both because it contains user generated content and to avoid the circular sourcing that could occur if Wikipedia articles referred to each other as sources. See WP:USERGENERATED for more discussion. Gab4gab (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should have mentioned WP:CIRCULAR which is a bit below USERGENERATED in the same article. If you have any questions or I can be of help feel free to ask me on my talk page. Gab4gab (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the input and information. I wondered about this when I did it, but had originally found the article on what appeared to be a non-Wikipedia wiki (?), but in the process of adding the citation was prompted with a link to a more recent version of the article, on Wikipedia. Also, please note that I reworked the sentence in question as well, but neglected to mention as much in the edit summary. The sentence had read that the pendulum was the furthest north in the world, while the article (list) indicated that there's one in Iceland that's further north, so I changed it to read North America when adding the citation (which is how it still reads, even after you removed the citation). I think the current text is more accurate--but no citation for either version, at this point.Kntripp (talk) 23:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked for supporting sources myself with nothing solid found. Claims of 1st, biggest, most significant and so on are a challenge when there is no recognized authority tracking them. The wording change is reasonable although, as you say, there is still no citation supporting it. Another option is to re-word the claim as "The UAA/API CL claims to have the northern most permanent Foucault pendulum..." which could cite their website. Gab4gab (talk) 15:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]