User talk:Knight Crawler X

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of MsGanda (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knight Crawler X

Welcome!

Hello, Knight Crawler X, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Generally the best place to request page protection is at WP:RPP which is staffed by many administrators rather than an individual administrators talk page (because it may be a while before they log on.) (Unless there is something unusual about the situation which the individual administrater is familiar with, but an outsider would take a long time to get up to speed.)Active Banana (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a draft of what the content of a successful request might look like.

Note:

1) if the vandalism is coming from just a small range of IP addresses (XX.YY.ZZ.23 and XX.YY.ZZ.26 and XX.YY.ZZ.27) it is better to ask for a range block of the IP addresses at WP:ANI>Vandalism in which case #3 HAS to have been met.

2) the edits in question must actually meet WP:VANDAL (I didnt look very closely, but I am not sure this condition has actually been met)

3) it is more likely if the offending part(ies) must have recieved (and ignored) adequate warnings

4) it is more likely if you have attempted to communicate with them on the Talk:Isang Lakas page and been ignored

You will need to change and add details as appropriate. Then copy and paste everything below my signature into the WP:RPP page. Active Banana (talk) 05:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isang Lakas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

long/OR/short term semi/OR/full protection - PUT YOUR REASON HERE, FOR EXAMPLE: the page has been a long time target of a series of IP editors who insert unsourced speculative content and other disruptive behavior despite having recieved substantial warnings. (give diff examples of WP:VANDAListic edits)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SockPuppets of MsGanda

im NOt a sockpuppets of MsGanda, it doesn't mean if we always edit the same Page is we are sockpuppets of each other, we don't know each other i don't know his/her name, i don't know everything about his/hers identity... we don't know each other... don't be fooled by detractors of mine because they want me out of wikipedia so that they can vandalize the page/pages i editing... so please help me because they are eager to remove me here... thanks & Godspeed... --Knight Crawler X (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't judge your edits, I used the checkuser tool and determined that there's zero doubt that you are socks. If you want to pretend MsGanda is separate, you better have some explaination about why you're using the same computer. Cool Hand Luke 12:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I promise that i don't know MsGanda, and Please stop saying that im a sockpuppet of her, i think it doesn't mean if you checkuser us that we are sockpuppet of each other, i don't think so.. so please please stop im sad, stress, & depressed of saying that im a sockpuppet of her. please stop harassing me... thanks & Godspeed. --Knight Crawler X (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heading text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight Crawler X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im requesting to unblock me, because of im not a sockpuppet of MsGanda, and i don't know her, if you think that MsGanda is a sockpuppet of me, im really really sorry, but as i know i don't know her, i don't know her name, i don't her email, & i don't know that she is using my computer "if" she is my sockpuppet, im really saddened & depressed about this because the only reason i know that i have to be blocked is edit warring and nothing else, if im guilty of sockpuppetting it's because i don't read the rules/regulations of wikipedia... i only known im guilty of is edit warring. im begging of you please unblock me im so so depressed now because of this issue, and one more thing i promise that if you unblock me i really will not do edit warring again & if im guilty of sockpuppetting, im also don't do it again. thanks & godspeed to all of us...

Decline reason:

It is not that you use the same computer, it is that you have done the exact same actions as MsGanda. The checkuser evidence that shows both account edit from the same computer is interesting, but ultimately is only extra evidence. The behavioral evidence here is strong enough to link the two accounts fairly easily. Jayron32 04:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.