Jump to content

User talk:Knight44 44

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for File:Kongu seir.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kongu seir.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ilavan.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ilavan.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Odanilai.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Odanilai.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 07:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kongu Nadu

[edit]

Please do not contribute large passages of text in Tamil to the English Wikipedia. Foreign language texts should be limited to quotations which also have to be translated and attributed. De728631 (talk) 16:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Adair2324 (talk) 04:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kongu Vellalar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheMike •Wassup doc? 15:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Kongu Vellalar constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kongu Vellalar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. TheMike •Wassup doc? 16:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Knight44 44. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 16:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Kongu Vellalar

[edit]

Hello Knight44 44, see, this website is purely for English content. Please provide a translation in English, or else the content is likely to be deleted. TheMike •Wassup doc? 15:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the article. Much of it is still in Tamil. TheMike •Wassup doc? 16:01, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mike check now the article ,I had removed Contents Present in Tamil--Knight44 44 (talk) 10:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've also had a look at the article. It would be very helpful if you could give a translation for all quotes used in the references. Inside the <ref></ref> tags with Tamil test, please leave the original Tamil as it is but add an English translation behind it. And then there's a book list with Tamil titles in the References section, placed in some headline like "further reading". It is overly long and you should limit this list to the most important titles, say four or five. Please provide also a translation of these titles and the names of any authors in Latin letters. Thanks a lot, De728631 (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose the "cleanup" tag refers to the several grammatical and spelling errors in the text and to the many bold text passages. Please see our manual of style for using bold text; normally only the page title in the introductory sentence is typed bold, and nothing else. I've also removed a lot of images with Tamil script because their meaning was not explained in the text and without a translation for each of them they'd be useless. And such original texts should always a source going along with them, explaining where the text comes from. The "confusing" tag was most likely put on because there are a whole lot of Tamil titles and other terms that are not explained. For details, I suggest you ask User:MikeLynch who installed those tags. De728631 (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kongu border.JPEG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kongu border.JPEG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kongu Arachlur Isai Kalvettu.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hindu.com/mp/2005/10/01/stories/2005100101370300.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Kongu Arachlur Isai Kalvettu.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kongu Arachlur Isai Kalvettu.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kongu Vellalar

[edit]

Hello, in response to your question, this is my reply: References can be in Tamil, but it is appreciated if they are in English. Try to keep them in English. I appreciate the amount of work you are doing in the article. Have a good day. TheMike •Wassup doc? 17:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still at a loss what all the Tamil script in the images is referring to. And e.g. this image contains two rows of = signs like in Wiki sytax for headlines. In an image file that is completely useless though since such code is of course not resolved. I would recommend to use just one or two central texts and give a full translation for them otherwise I think they are not helpful indeed. De728631 (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kongu Kani patu.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.viruba.com/final.aspx?id=VB0002336. As a copyright violation, File:Kongu Kani patu.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kongu Kani patu.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 00:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kongu Sepadu.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.viruba.com/final.aspx?id=VB0002335. As a copyright violation, File:Kongu Sepadu.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kongu Sepadu.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kongu Ponnivala nadu English action 5min.ogg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.legendofponnivala.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Kongu Ponnivala nadu English action 5min.ogg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kongu Ponnivala nadu English action 5min.ogg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kongu Ponnivala Nadu Tamil conceptual 6min.ogv, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.legendofponnivala.com/index.html. As a copyright violation, File:Kongu Ponnivala Nadu Tamil conceptual 6min.ogv appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kongu Ponnivala Nadu Tamil conceptual 6min.ogv has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 00:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ponnival Key-game.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.legendofponnivala.com/ponnivala_game.html. As a copyright violation, File:Ponnival Key-game.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ponnival Key-game.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 00:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy content from outside Wikipedia

[edit]

On a very serious note, please do not upload any more files to Wikipedia unless it is really obvious that you created them yourself. And do not copy and paste entire websites like this one into articles. All that is a violation of copyright and cannot be tolerated for legal reasons.

Please review all of your recently uploaded images you added to Kongu Vellalar and Kongu Nadu (or elsewhere) and either mark them for deletion where you actually took them from a foreign source or add a {{rationale}} to the page where the copyrighted image is stored on Wikipedia. That said, an article should not have more than perhaps three copyrighted images at all. Stating that you created the files yourself as you did at all your uploads was obviously not true either in most cases.

I have already removed and tagged most images from Kongu Vellalar and have also started at Kongu Nadu. Again, copying images from published sources is prohibited, as is the copying of large amounts of text. If you found a noteworthy text, please rewrite it over here with your own words. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 01:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ponnival Parcheesi-demo-board.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ponnival Parcheesi-demo-board.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

—SpacemanSpiff 07:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —SpacemanSpiff 07:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight44 44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not PONDHEEPANKAR, my name is kaviyarasu my email id is kaviemb@gmail.com [|this my orkut profile],u mistakely thought that i am pondepikar Knight44 44 (talk) 08:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight44 44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i not a pondheepankar,what else proof u need to prove that i am different person, admistrators and [|SpacemanSpiff] please unblock me as soon as possible Knight44 44 (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In response to your email reg, unblock, the pattern of edits -- topic and POV are the same from the many PONDHEEPANKAR socks. The Orkut profile or any such thing doesn't matter because of the history. You have also used PONDHEEPANKAR's email id on your contributions here. —SpacemanSpiff 12:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

//In response to your email reg, unblock, the pattern of edits -- topic and POV are the same from the many PONDHEEPANKAR socks// he too from my caste doing phd on history. because my area of interest to same with him (i.e)the collecting of my caste history infomation(Kongu vellalar gounders ).i collected information about kongu vellalar for last 1 and 1/2 years various books,peer reviewed journal etc.. from internet and library, one of source of my information was PONDHEEPANKAR bolg on Internet [[2]] he had collected some info about kongu vellalar and placed in his blogs .Knight44 44 (talk) 05:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

//You have also used PONDHEEPANKAR's email id on your contributions here.// Kongu Nadu.jpeg which i uploaded in wiki was got from this blog of PONDHEEPANKAR [[3]], so u got PONDHEEPANKAR's email id on this contribution. so u mistaken me that i was PONDHEEPANKAR and blocked me Knight44 44 (talk) 05:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight44 44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

//In response to your email reg, unblock, the pattern of edits -- topic and POV are the same from the many PONDHEEPANKAR socks//

he too from my caste doing phd on history. because my area of interest to same with him (i.e)the collecting of my caste history infomation(Kongu vellalar gounders ).i collected information about kongu vellalar for last 1 and 1/2 years various books,peer reviewed journal etc.. from internet and library, one of source of my information was PONDHEEPANKAR bolg on Internet 8 he had collected some info about kongu vellalar and placed in his blogs

//You have also used PONDHEEPANKAR's email id on your contributions here.//

Kongu Nadu.jpeg which i uploaded in wiki was got from this blog of PONDHEEPANKAR 9, so u got PONDHEEPANKAR's email id on this contribution. so u mistaken me that i was PONDHEEPANKAR and blocked me . Knight44 44 (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not only is this unblock request nearly impossible to understand, it's almost a repetition of previous requests. The actions by both accounts on such rare topics is a clear link. The uploading of copyright files is problematic. The use of a BLOG as an attempted source is even more issue-laden. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight44 44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To admins , i am different person ,i am not PONDHEEPANKAR , by what way that i can prove to u guys that i am a diffrent person , u people labeling me as PONDHEEANKAR , every thing u people deny, say what way i can prove u that i a different person Knight44 44 (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per above. It's fairly obvious. I'm locking down talk page access, your'e using it to gain attention more than anything else. You may go down other channels outlined at WP:UNBLOCK if you wish to do so in the future. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Kongu veliyan chera queen.JPEG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kongu veliyan chera queen.JPEG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kongu KUDREMUKH-1.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kongu KUDREMUKH-1.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kongu KUDREMUKH-1.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kongu KUDREMUKH-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kongu Nadu.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kongu Kudremukh.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kongu Kudremukh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have numerous files listed for discussion at today's log here : Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 28#Files_from_User:Knight44_44 Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knight44_44&oldid=1088035069"