User talk:Knguyeniii
|
A tag has been placed on Sap security, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Sap security and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is not promoting sap, rather it's talking about an issue relevant to legistlation trends and security trends on a particular enterprise platform - sap.
- if you guys have guidance (i.e. outline) to make it neutral, please let me know how. i am new to placing content on wikipedia.
- i am a user of sap and trying to use wikipedia as platform to agglomerate my research and understanding of this topic.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Knguyeniii (talk • contribs) (moved here from SAP talk page where article has already been deleted)
- I've posted a welcome message with some general links above.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Madcoverboy (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Id_card.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Id_card.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 03:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
PCI DSS and SAP / ERP
[edit]Hello Knguyeniii, glad to have you on the PCI DSS page. One thing though - can you clarify how "Strong encrypt communication throughout enterprise software platforms from SAP and Oracle Corporation can be achieved through end-to-end encryption between ERP user interfaces and ERP servers, or between servers and outside systems." belongs in PCI DSS? The standard does not actually mandate encryption between internal systems, so it's deceptive to imply that this is necessary. I'd ask the same question of your "end to end encryption" entry in the "best practices" section. (That said, as I mention in the discussion page, the "best practices" section may be deleted anyway.) Random name (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Secude links
[edit]Greetings again Knguyeniii! I notice looking through your edits that you do seem to add a lot of links to Secude. Can I suggest you review Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest?
Commercial pages and whitepapers that act as promotional brochures are not generally appropriate material for Wikipedia. Please also have a look at Wikipedia:External Links: Links to normally be avoided, particular number five in the list. Random name (talk) 11:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk page guidelines
[edit]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Intgr were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 20:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
The Tale of the Silver Samurai
[edit]Hello Everyone,
I used to be a "Silver Samurai". This is the kind of samurai that can do real kick-ass stuff. Too many to list here though.
Knguyeniii (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Authentication Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
The article SECUDE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article does not prove any notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Product/market fit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Relationship and Channel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Product/market fit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lean Enterprise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just-in-Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Secure Store and Forward has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. Wikipedia is not a software manual.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 23:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Secure Store and Forward for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure Store and Forward until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
PepperBeast (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Knguyeniii/Innovation strategy
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Knguyeniii/Innovation strategy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)