User talk:Kneakie1
July 2008
[edit]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lennar Corporation, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 17:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lennar Corporation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Washburnmav (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Lennar Corporation. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Washburnmav (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lennar Corporation. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 15:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
==Vandalism==
Two users are hereby being put on notice for continuing vandalism to this article by removing sourced text in the controversy section of this--Lennar Corporation--article:
- Jehochman
- Kneakie1
It is my understanding that if this behavior is continued, penalties such as being blocked from future edits to this site may be imposed.
--David Tornheim (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I am an administrator. David Tornheim is about to receive a warning from me for violating assume good faith, for issuing a bogus vandalism warning to me. I am not sure whether Kneakie1's warnings are valid or not. There appears to be a group of activists attempting to own the Lennar Corporation article and use it as a soapbox. Please be careful before applying any blocks. The situation may not be what it appears. Jehochman Talk 21:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- This warning isn't valid either, this editor hasn't edited past his level 4 warning. Therefore this warning is irrelevant as well. However, I'm not sure what you mean about all the other warnings, or if you are referring to them. All the other warnings are from editors like myself patrolling the recent changes. Kneakie1 kept blanking an entire section with references, without discussing or even using the edit summary. Landon1980 (talk) 00:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think this may be somebody associated with the company who has become frustrated, or who does not understand Wikipedia. We should apply WP:BITE and try to talk to them before placing any blocks. They may have legitimate concerns, and in any case, if we can work out issues, that takes less effort and produces better karma than blocking them. Jehochman Talk 00:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds like a plan :). Landon1980 (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think this may be somebody associated with the company who has become frustrated, or who does not understand Wikipedia. We should apply WP:BITE and try to talk to them before placing any blocks. They may have legitimate concerns, and in any case, if we can work out issues, that takes less effort and produces better karma than blocking them. Jehochman Talk 00:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- This warning isn't valid either, this editor hasn't edited past his level 4 warning. Therefore this warning is irrelevant as well. However, I'm not sure what you mean about all the other warnings, or if you are referring to them. All the other warnings are from editors like myself patrolling the recent changes. Kneakie1 kept blanking an entire section with references, without discussing or even using the edit summary. Landon1980 (talk) 00:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)