User talk:Kmrarun

Welcome!

Hello, Kmrarun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk) 14:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree use rationale

I am not convinced that the nonfree use rationale for File:Pieris brassicae Butterflies of Panjab University Chandigarh.jpg is compelling. Before I nominate for deletion, though, I'm not clear what you mean by the phrase "consent of creator is taken". Can you explain?--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sphilbrick

As you have sought clarification on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Kmrarun about a photograph, I would like apprise that the photo is clicked by Mr. Navtej Singh but I have uploaded with his consent on wikipedia for the viewers. Please specify why would you nominate the same for deletion? 'Consent of creator is taken' == consent of photographer is obtained .. but since the phrase did confuse you, I am changing the words. Please see if you are ok with the same else you may like to specify what should I do?

Warm Regards

Dr. Arun Bansal kmrarun@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.246.18 (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pieris brassicae Butterflies of Panjab University Chandigarh.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pieris brassicae Butterflies of Panjab University Chandigarh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sfan00

As I understand that the file is flagged because of permissions associated with the file. I did upload the file after permissions from the one who is not tech (wikipedia) savvy. moreover I am admin to the group https://www.facebook.com/groups/naturalbiodiversity/ that works under GPL and any pic posted there can be used by the members/admin/society with credits. Further I learnt that for wikipedia I was asked to arrange the explicit permission email from the authentic ID of the original source. This is practically not possible for me as I had plan to update wikipedia for many relevant images to various topics related to biodiversity. After this communication, if you feel the pic should be removed, I can do so. I would be uploading only my clicks in that case.

I suggest that there should be a way out of verification of the uploader and only email from the one (not from every photographer but uploader) should be sufficient.

Regards

Dr. Arun Bansal ^[1]

^ https://www.facebook.com/groups/naturalbiodiversity/

[1] ttps://www.facebook.com/groups/naturalbiodiversity/

[1]