User talk:Kmr535

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 06:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 06:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

A report has been filed at WP:BLPN regarding your continued blanking of material at the Keith Michael article. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from editing articles that you are involved with. You can discuss concerns on the article's talk page, but you cannot edit the article directly since you clearly have a conflict of interest. Please review our policies; we have processes for updating Biographical articles with information from their subjects, but blanking sections isn't the way to do it. You might also consider reviewing our article on the Streisand Effect. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Suspected Sockpuppetry

Good morning. I've filed a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kmr535 that details your possible use of sockpuppets in a manner not consistent with our policies. This is your notice of that report. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Temporarily blocked for sock puppetry

{{Unblock on hold|MuZemike|i sent an email to MuZemike explaining my reasons & my ignorance as to how this process works. i would just ask that this email be read and just corrections are made-thank you| PeterSymonds (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)}}

I believe the blocking administrator has instructed you to email the unblock mailing list. As such, I'm putting this on hold pending a final response. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

None of which changes the fact that you removed valid, sourced information, ignored the Conflict of interest guidelines, used multiple accounts and lied in your various edit summaries. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 22:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

To administrators looking at this unblock request: there are some sensitive BLP issues involved here. Instead of holding such discussion on-wiki, I have instructed the user to email unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. I advise administrators to keep the case on that mailing list for privacy reasons. Regards, MuZemike 22:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)