User talk:Kmills
Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Additional tips
[edit]Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
- Find everything in the Directory.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- Introduce yourself at the new user log.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
- If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
- To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
- Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round. 
Joe I 14:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I am concerned that your article on Inner Banks doesn't meet some of our guidelines for inclusion. From my Google searches, this doesn't seem to be a wide spread term or a wide spread organization. I am also concerned with the way in which you added "This town is part of the Inner Banks" to a lot of North Carolina articles. Can you please provide some sources that this term is widely used and isn't merely a WP:NEO? Metros232 18:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- What needs to be done to clean this page up so the banners can be removed that say the neutrality is disputed? This article is virtually identical to the Outer Banks article yet that one is not disputed. On the discussion pages, people who like the article are people who actually live here and have knowledge related to the discussion while people who don't like the article are people who are not from the region and lack any knowledge of the topic. Metros232's bio says he is from Maryland... Why are there Wikipedia articles on Western Maryland, Eastern Shore of Maryland, and other regions in Maryland if not for advertising purposes? I'm from eastern North Carolina and have never been to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, nor have I ever heard it called by that name until I took the time to look into it. If an article about a region can be accused of "advertising" then there are hundreds, if not thousands of articles that need to be removed from Wikipedia. --Kevin R Mills 15:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- You'd have to talk to User:Gooday.1, the one that added those tags to see why the user felt it violated those policies. Metros232 15:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I added those tags because there were a few weasel words in the article (phrases like "beautiful shoreline" and "hidden treasure" are just some examples I can think off the top of my head.) That's now long been fixed. My comment about the actual existence of the inner banks is not related to those tags. If you say its called that, then so be it. Hey, also, do you know if the Cluster Metro is real or not? I can't find anything that even remotely supports that name on Google. --TinMan 07:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm affraid I am unfamiliar with the term Cluster Metro despite the fact that I was stationed at Pope Air Force Base in Fayetteville from 96-00. I am somewhat new to Wikipedia, the Inner Banks article being my only real contribution, and this may come across as ad hominum, but the Cluster Metro article looks like it could use some serious reworking.--Kevin R Mills 15:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- I added those tags because there were a few weasel words in the article (phrases like "beautiful shoreline" and "hidden treasure" are just some examples I can think off the top of my head.) That's now long been fixed. My comment about the actual existence of the inner banks is not related to those tags. If you say its called that, then so be it. Hey, also, do you know if the Cluster Metro is real or not? I can't find anything that even remotely supports that name on Google. --TinMan 07:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- You'd have to talk to User:Gooday.1, the one that added those tags to see why the user felt it violated those policies. Metros232 15:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- How do I add Inner Banks to the list of regions in the North Carolina box at the bottom of the Inner Banks page? Inner Banks is in the Regions of North Carolina page now but does not appear in the box... It is not in the box on the North Carolina page either.
- Thanks to whoever rectified this.--Kevin R Mills 15:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:CNHR.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:CNHR.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:CNHR Logo.JPG
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:CNHR Logo.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
File:Topographic map of North Carolina's Inner Banks.jpg missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
The file File:Topographic map of North Carolina's Inner Banks.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 15:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
