User talk:Kmccook

Aware of Discretionary Sanctions

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ProgressiveLibrarian.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:ProgressiveLibrarian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license =

Thank you

	Editors like you keep the machine working
	Hi there! I see you building up the article on James B. Carey. A very interesting life. (And coincidental death date.) I wonder if there is yet more information on his experiences in the CIO. Anyway, it takes a lot of effort to make something from scratch like that. Thank you for your hard work! groupuscule (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

François-Henry Laperrine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nimuaq (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Your recent editing history at Grumman J2F Duck shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - BilCat (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lyman Gilmore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Pioneer" by Stephen Barber. ''Nevada County Historical Society'', Volume 30, No. 2. April, 1976.)</ref> The printed story indicated accidental causes, but another version hinted that the fire was

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anouar Benmalek

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anouar Benmalek, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ecrivainsmaghrebins.blogspot.com/2009/10/anouar-benmalek.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aine Ni Mhuiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your recognition of my work! I really appreciate that. Let me know if you see anything interesting for me to do over the summer.Petercannon usf (talk) 17:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zoë Wicomb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Zoë Wicomb''' ([[Namaqualand]], November 23, 1948 in Namaqualand, South Africa is a [[South Africa]]n author .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The New Press (imprint)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The New Press (imprint), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://thenewpress.com/about/about-new-press.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The New Press (imprint) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Press (imprint) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Press (imprint) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFC at Wikipedia for page protection

Last call for opinions on RFC at Wikipedia page for page protection extension. User:Pundit is in support of increasing gender equality at Wikipedia and another user is opposed to User:Pundit's efforts. RFC ends on the 14th. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for your great work on the University of Chicago Graduate Library School page. Petercannon usf (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Chicago Graduate Library School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear Energy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Association for Library and Information Science Education may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Library Media Connection (LMC Magazine), ALISE Youth Services and School Library Media SIGs (for research papers addressing library and information science issues for children and young adults.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jennie Allen

Hi there - I saw you did some page curation at Jennie Allen. The article was created by a user of the same name, which is an almost sure sign of a WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Best to leave them a {{uw-autobiography}} notice to let them know that this is frowned upon, and to get them to refrain from making further significant edits to the article.

I'm debating on whether to propose it for deletion, as all the sources are affiliated with her publisher or her non-profit group. --Drm310 (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isiah C. Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Helen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Alexander

I worked on it some more. Do you like or approve of my changes to the article.AdditionSubtraction (talk) 03:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UWI Museum page

	Many Thanks
	Thanks for editing the page. I've added some more info and I see where there's a link from the University of the West Indies page. Hope this all improves the entry. Sfbja14 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dori

Thanks! I've only just started out with it, plan to do a lot more work on it soon. ProfessorTofty (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Cornelius Kellogg

Thank you for reviewing my article and your kind comments. Richlevine00 (talk) 02:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Promoting Wikipedia to Librarians

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		This is recognition of all the work you do to promote this excellent resource in all your courses.Petercannon usf (talk) 19:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 9

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IdeaLab proposal

There is a proposal at the IdeaLab that may interest you. Lightbreather (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know...

Did you know that you have your Internationalisation preference set to "She edits wiki pages" (yeah!), but you aren't a member of Category:Female Wikipedians? I hope that you'll add yourself! Lightbreather (talk) 23:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. Kmccook (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hope you like kittens! (Somebody ought to add puppy love - but I love 'em both.)

Lightbreather (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lizzie Pitts Merrill Palmer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Merrill and Palmer Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Test Kaffeeklatsch area for women-only

Since WikiProject Women as proposed at the IdeaLab may take some time to realize, and based on a discussion on the proposal's talk page, I have started a test Kaffeeklatsch area for women (cis, lesbian, transgender) only. If interested, your participation would be most welcome. Lightbreather (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: The MfD for the Kaffeeklatsch was closed with the result page kept,[2] and this notice[3] re the WMF non discrimination policy was put on my page by Harej. (In a nutshell, the klatsch does not violate the policy.)

I don't know how the proposed WikiProject Women at the IdeaLab will fare, but one step at a time, I guess. Lightbreather (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josephine Adams Rathbone

Thanks for starting the Josephine Adams Rathbone page. I was wondering if you were planning on expanding it. I ask because she looks interesting and I might expand it myself, but certainly don't wish to "step on any toes" if you plan to do so yourself. (I have PLENTY of other projects to do as well.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1000th edit

I just did my 1000th Wikipedia edit. I added a photo of the Cleveland Public Library to the entry on Linda Eastman. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Linda_Eastman

Congratulations on your 1000th Edit!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your 1000th edit as an inspiration to us all!Petercannon usf (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:DawsonAlma (1).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DawsonAlma (1).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Start

| |{{Template:User clean start}}

|

This user edited under a previous user name. This account is a clean start.

|Usage |- I realize that older accounts I used, none of which are particularly contentious, may confuse admins. So I am no longer using them. I had used them less and less but now realize the need to retire them. This is my only current account.Kmccook

.

E-mail

|

@

This user can be reached by email.

|

Notable American Women

I created the page link below as as basis of recognition of effort made by women to document women's achievements. I notice that many women in NAB are not in Wikipedia. Might be a good project to review entries. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Notable_American_Women,_1607-1950;_a_Biographical_Dictionary. I have reached out to several editors on this topic and if I received response it was positive.Kmccook (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Writing Women's Lives

I commend this article. Ware, Susan. "Writing Women's Lives: One Historian's Perspective." Journal Of Interdisciplinary History 40, no. 3 (Winter 2010): 413-435.

Removing projects

I have removed specific projects from the Historical page for school and university projects because I think that this has been damaging to the projects as they have been singled out for deletion. I am not sure how this kind of thing happens, but to lessen opportunity I deleted specific examples. Makes me sad.

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Reason Why I Reverted At Qilin

I reverted it because a one-line mention of a walking stick just sounds unimportant. For starters, is a "kylin" the same thing as a qilin? If so, then why is it spelled differently? Does the walking-stick have a profound, qilin-related impact on the plot? Does this "kylin-headed" walking stick have notability outside of the book? That, and "In Popular Culture" sections should not be a laundry list of every appearance the subject has made. If you think it's notable, then the onus is on you to explain and cite why it is notable.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

kmccook responds: Yes, it is a variant spelling and as I noted when I reverted this it is mentioned multiple times in the book--The Last Dickens that uses the kylin throughout and in the final sequences, but if the onus is on me (bold letters, you sound very stern) I can't do much more to convince you. It is not worth an edit war. Kmccook (talk) 22:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better with a Man

This is the kind of bully behavior that happens at WP, too.

Female Scientists Told To Add A Male Author To Their Study

see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/01/sexist-peer-review_n_7190656.html

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retiring and closing Kaffeeklatsch

I will be retiring from Wikipedia soon and wanted to let you know that I am closing down the Kaffeeklatsch. Thanks for expressing an interest in a place for women Wikipedia editors. Sorry I couldn't develop it. Lightbreather (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruskin, Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uzita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 13

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Projects on Talk:Elizabeth Gray Vining

Hi Kmccook, I recently came across the above talkpage and was surprised to see that it had no wikiprojects but the following words:

IP user 24.92.174.244 is adding unnecessary templates without sufficient explanation. This appears to be vandalism as IP User 24.92.174.244 is focusing on women librarians who are noted for social justice and labor activism.

There is an unidentified IP user vandalizing librarian entries,

Looking at the page's history I see that you removed all of its projects and added the above words in April 2015. Sorry, but I don't understand what this means as the projects have been added by different editors and appear relevant to the article subject. I have reinstated the projects. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 15

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
#1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 16

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
New Library Card Platform and Conference news
Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kmccook. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 20

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

Partner resource expansions
New search tool for finding TWL resources
#1lib1ref 2017
Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

#1lib1ref 2017
Wikipedia Library User Group
Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
Spotlight: Library Card Platform

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

New and expanded research accounts
Global branches update
Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:08-Johnny-Cash-Nudie-suit-timeline-bb11-style-2016-billboard-1000.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:08-Johnny-Cash-Nudie-suit-timeline-bb11-style-2016-billboard-1000.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories

Hello. When you create a new category, it's really important that you categorise it to put it within the category hierarchy so that humans and maintenance bots can find it. Browsing the existing hierarchy or using WP:HOTCAT are both good ways to find suitable parent categories. In doing so you may find categories that duplicate the new one - for instance I'd suggest that Category:Authors' libraries is close enough to Category:Literary archives for separate categories to be WP:Overcategorization. Cheers Le Deluge (talk) 18:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & thank you, but these are their books, not their papers. I was looking at the Ransom Center collection and saw that they not only accept archives but also the books off shelves of authors. I can see why they merge in categories, tho. Thank you. Kmccook

Copyright problem on Horace Logan

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/flo79. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was paraphrased and cited. but I'm glad the page has remained. Mr. Logan was impt. to rockabilliy legacies. Kmccook (talk) 12:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright violation and was assessed by myself. Your addition contained quite a bit of overlap with the source webpage, requiring copyvio clean-up. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This was not looked at carefully. To me discourages participation. Perhaps the topic was not to your liking but this was  dispiriting. Bots can be used one way or the other depending on bias and individual preference.

Books and Bytes - Issue 23

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

Library card
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Why do you keep putting the four tildes ~~~~ in your Edit summaries? It's not needed. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was how to show I did it. What did I screw up now? and how on earth did you see I was doing it? I think an admin told me to do it.

The kind of page you're looking at right now -- any page with "Talk" in it, like User talk:TenPoundHammer or Talk:Main Page -- that is where you use the tildes. Not in edit summaries (which is the really long skinny box saying "Edit summary" on any page). Like, right after the word "sentence" in this sentence. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

User Group update
Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

apology needed I feel

for your disgusting generalised statements here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Harvey_Weinstein_sexual_abuse_allegations Simply-the-truth (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC) It continues More Women Say Harvey Weinstein Sexually Assaulted Them[reply]

The post was not addressed to you.Kmccook (talk) 16:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was im afraid. You tarred all male editors with the same disgusting accusations. If I made such a general claim about females im sure you would be very offended. You really do need to apologise for these sexist remarks?Simply-the-truth (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kmccook: I'm concerned that User:Simply-the-truth is trying to kindle an argument here, so let me step in. Your comment was not addressed to anyone specific, just a comment accusing Wikipedia's editors of being unwilling to cover the topic. You have to be careful, as the wording accused a great many editors of sexism. Many of us are committed to maintaining good, factual and neutral coverage of these topics, including myself. I'm not asking for you to apologise or say anything at all, but bear this in mind next time before you post. And if you feel provoked by User:Simply-the-truth, don't rise to the bait. Anywikiuser (talk) 12:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of editors are men. Initially the Weinstein harassment posts were moved to their own page that was then slated for deletion and required a discussion to retain This certainly was not all male all editors, but the fact that the article had a deletion discussion startd with this statement: "Like everything else controversial in the news, this incident blew up overnight and will likely die down soon. If it continues garnering significant and important coverage beyond the original story, like California's or New York's statute of limitations for rape allows for charges against Weinstein, if there's a trial, an uncovered sex ring, crimes were committed, and so on, then I would say this article is appropriate. This story really has no impact right now other than Hollywood and politicians covering their behinds," was almost an instantaneous Wikipedia modeling of victim blaming. I know most editors have objectivity at heart. I believe Simply-the-Truth is a vandal. Thank you for your support. Kmccook (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and thanks. Yes, the AfD nominator made the wrong decision, and I too am glad that the rest of us overruled it. Anywikiuser (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you dont mind me commenting here again. I was never looking for an argument at any time. I truly was greatly offended by the wording of your remarks. The things that man has been accused off are terribile, so to be painted as the same by poor wording was not nice at all. I now accept that this was all that it was, slightly poor wording and my wrong take on what @Kmccok was saying. So no apology needed at all, and I apologise if I upset you as well, never my intention. Have a great rest of the week! Simply-the-truth (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

#1Lib1Ref
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 27

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

#1Lib1Ref
New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
User Group
Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 28

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

#1Bib1Ref
New partners
User Group update
Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
Wikimania
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Collins article

In a 2014 article Collins body-shamed Senator Barbara Mikulski for being petite in stature with the title, "Barbara Mikulski’s Hottest Moments " which appeared in the Daily Caller. This is a fact. I have explained at the dispute site that belittling people of petite stature is mean-spirited.

See here. Thanks. PaulCHebert (talk) 17:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

Library Card translation
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Makes Me Weep

Wikipedia makes me weep. I have found Wikipedia to be a very hostile place, sometimes. Full of themselves editors delete because they can. They cite rules and regulations to cover their meanness. As do most tyrants. I have tried to encourage young people to edit but a speedy deletion can crush their desire. Once in a while an editor is kind and helps the new person but the more frequent response to a new person's efforts is "off with their head." Wikipedia makes me weep.Kmccook (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

OAWiki
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

#1Lib1Ref
New and expanded partners
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wanda Kay Brown has been accepted

Wanda Kay Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jessamyn (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya -- I cleaned this up a little but it was really good already. Now approved! Jessamyn (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Thrasher has been accepted

Jason Thrasher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jessamyn (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 33

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius C. Jefferson Jr. has been accepted

Julius C. Jefferson Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jessamyn (talk) 13:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

Partnerships
#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

Wikimania
We're building something great, but..
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
A Wikibrarian's story
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

#1Lib1Ref January 2020
#1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Matthew Kaminski, from its old location at User:Kmccook/Matthew Kaminski musician. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Kaminski (musician) (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Kaminski (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matthew Kaminski (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kmccook! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Kaminski (musician) has been accepted

Matthew Kaminski (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 38, January – April 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020

New partnership
Global roundup

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

Library Card Platform
New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Browns+slavery

Hi Kmccook, I have reverted your edit about 'slave trading of Brown' on Brown uni page for now. I removed it for it would be better to build consensus on talk page for contentious additions. Still, I think it is a interesting and worthy topic to expand on. The Slavery and Justice report subsection under History tab on Brown uni page currently has expand section tag and can definitely use help. Let me know if I can assist. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 05:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joy James has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joy James. Thanks! Jessamyn (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
#1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 41

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020

New partnership: Taxmann
WikiCite
1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Kmccook! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:31, Saturday, December 26, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Organized labour project

Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

New EBSCO collections now available
1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
Library Card input requested
Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WSJ op-ed page

WSJ editorials are not reliable sources. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to get the facts about the Florida coronavirus pandemic management on to this Wikipedia page

I am a 40 year public health professional in Gainesville with 20 years of experience in coronavirus management, starting with SARS in 2003, MERS in 2015, and now COVID-19. Among other credentials, I invented and brought through regulatory approval two coronavirus diagnostics, today used in developing countries as well as Europe and the US.

We are trying to ensure that Snooganssnoogans, Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck, and other individuals do not successfully transform Wikipedia from a reliable source of information into a partisan attack sheet. Unfortunately, I have a job, and have not yet learned the rules of managing people like Snooganssnoogans and Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. WSJ "opinion" pieces are more reliable than Washington Post "news" pieces". And people die because of the misinformation that Snooganssnoogans and Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck post here. Accordingly, I have contacted Wikipedia directly about Snooganssnoogans amd Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck and, since I am a large donor to Wikipedia, I actually got a reply.

So that you know, here are the facts from the perspective of a public health professional, with references.

As the pandemic unfolded in 2020, public health scientists worldwide engaged in a discussion about the value of different public health measures to manage the pandemic. In these properties, CoVID-19 differed dramatically from other coronaviruses, notable SARS 2003 and MERS. This discussion included the effectiveness of lockdowns in improving public health outcomes. Several states, including California, Michigan, and New York, and many international jurisdictions, notably the United Kingdom, undertook large scale lockdowns.

Acting on that science, after a brief "stay at home order" in early spring, Governor DeSantis chose for Florida a pandemic response similar to that of Sweden. Elderly living facilities were protected, with DeSantis choosing to minimize lockdowns. As the pandemic progressed, DeSantis continued to adjust his policy as science and data showed that lockdowns created other problems in public health, including mental health. Further, peer reviewed literature established that lockdowns had substantial economic cost. A year into the pandemic, the Florida strategy had proven successful by many metrics, especially in comparison with states that chose severe lockdowns. Florida never became a "global epicenter of the coronavirus", as some had predicted. Instead, the total number of cases per 100,000 in Florida was 8734, compared to California (8805) and New York (8337). The total number of deaths per 100,000 in Florida was 144, compared to California (132), New York (163), and the US as a whole (154). If the data are adjusted for population age, Florida's outcome is especially significant, as Florida ranks second in the US in its proportion of elderly.

These data informed public debate, not only for the COVID-19 pandemic but for future pandemics. In particular, they suggested that lockdowns did not have material impact on public health outcomes, while they created collateral medical and economic damage. Thus, by the end of the year, Florida has performed economically better than the lockdown jurisdictions by many metrics. For example, as of December 2020, Florida's unemployment rate was 6.1%, compared to the national 6.7% rate.

The pandemic was also unusual in the degree to which specific news outlets politicized public health decisions. The Brookings Institute noted that "politics is wrecking America's pandemic response",

gaps" with Democrats generally favoring extreme lockdowns. Many of the politically motivated comments assumed that extreme lockdowns were the only "correct" response to the pandemic, with Brookings remarking "even though they reflected as unfortunate reactions based on distrust of the President, rather than proposals grounded in evidence". Brookings Institute noted that "[w]hatever the public health merits, we find that lockdown policies and business closures do real damage to the economy that goes beyond the actual effects predicted by infections or deaths at the county level." Brookings reported that as of September, unemployment in Republican states was 6.7%, while unemployment in Democrat states was 11.3%.

Image tagging for File:John N. Berry, III.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John N. Berry, III.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
1Lib1Ref
Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henrietta M. Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storyteller. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

New Library Card designs
1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Edit warring about inclusion of fact that Ian Fleming was founder of the journal, The Book Collector, in Ian Fleming article

This wasn't really a war--it was my attempt to add a fact to the article on Ian Fleming that a more experienced editor didn't want there. I lost. The fact was that Ian Fleming founded a journal, The Book Collector. This information is not wanted on that page. Maybe because it is "The Agent’s Secret"--the title of an article in the Times Literary Supplement.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ HAL333 16:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will not work any more to add the information that Ian Fleming was a founder of The Book Collector, but I do have a citation ^[1] and have now been alerted by this EDIT WAR message that I should not add to the article because..I do not know why except the Ian Fleming page at Wikipedia must be a man's world where women Wikipedia editors will be schooled. I wish Wikipedia would post an alert to women editors that some topics are off limits to wom"--as explen.Kmccook (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC) I see the citation I added to the Ian Fleming page from the Times Literary Supplement no. 5946 (2017): 36^[2] has been deleted. The Ian Fleming page thus remains free of information that Fleming founded the The Book Collector. I can't see why they want to hush this up, but there you go.Kmccook (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ J.C.“The Agent’s Secret.” TLS. Times Literary Supplement no. 5946 (2017): 36.
^ J.C.“[1]” TLS. Times Literary Supplement no. 5946 (2017): 36.

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Karpeles (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It appears Karpele's collection may be notable, but David himself is not. Requires significant coverage of the subject in multiple independent secondary reliable sources on his own- not how he is related to other notable subjects- and interviews and/or publicity pieces do not count towards notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Karpeles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Karpeles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

Library design improvements continue
New partnerships
1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

have watched the editing on my wachlist of what I once owned - a full set whats more until the 2000's -

of the book collector. It's a sad reflection on everything that so few external refs are available on the publication - so thanks anyways - as far as I can tell from the oz copyright laws - the first two years covers would be now in public domain - in oz at least... my vagrant copies are deep in a system that I would not find in the short term - you probably deserve some sort of medal for survival of the zoo/circus, also, if no one has suggested - archiving talk pages can be a fruitful exercise, but then there is an element of reckless living inleaving it out there... JarrahTree 14:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for encouragement. I'm wending my way through back issues. Lots of never cited items that are useful, I think.Kmccook (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest Bramah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Idler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

Library design improvements deployed
New collections available in English and German
Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Kaminski (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
Search tool deployed
New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla content

Hi there. Thank you for contributing the image to Tesla, Inc.. That said, if you are an owner of a Tesla and want to contribute written content to Tesla-related articles, please follow the directions for indicating a WP:COI. Thank you. QRep2020 (talk) 17:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have a TESLA. The image shows joy at the update. Merry Christmas. Kmccook (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

1Lib1Ref 2022
Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

New library collections
Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

New library partner - SPIE
1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
Feedback requested on this newsletter
1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Kmccook! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:50, Monday, August 29, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jay I. Kislak has been accepted

Jay I. Kislak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jessamyn (my talk page) 13:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note

Please note that the article Aaron Maté is now under a 72-hour one-revert restriction for the next month (till 6 December), up from the normal 24-hour restriction in place for all Syrian Civil War articles. This message is being sent to all recent editors of that article, and implies no wrongdoing on your part.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
New feature: Outage notification
Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your substack

You are, of course, free to post things like: https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/librarians-need-to-take-wikipedia on sites like substack.

But, it demonstrates your inability to understand the difference between a social media or newsletter site and an encyclopedia. Which is why you are having difficulties here. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Examining the history of a page and the edit summaries of the reverting editors provides context. It is fairly clear that women editors are monitored in ways that male editors are not. This is a major reason there are so few women editors. Tone is important. I know there is rigorous push back against attempts to demonstrate that rules aren't consistent, but they are not. If the "reliable sources" do not cover an issue it cannot be cited. In the case of the Twitter Files the "reliable sources" have decided that it is not an important story. And this is because they have missed a very big story. They should be ashamed. Kmccook (talk) 01:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Female editors are absolutely not treated in any way different than males. Some of the best admins are female, and no one needs to state their sex. Indeed, during most of WP history, gender was not known and you still don't have to reveal it. That's why gender neutral pronouns are so often used here. If you can find a single example of such, bring it up. As for the Twitter Files being an important story, that's your opinion and our opinions don't count. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Posting at my page to scold demonstrates otherwise. Kmccook (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, so you assume me explaining something to you has something to do with you being female and therefore I'm a sexist? You are not close. I think men are mostly a silly breed. But, I won't bother you again. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do think it was sort of a mansplaining action ("me explaining something to you.") The [[Twitter Files]] is important because it deals with censorship by government. That's not my opinion. It is a fact. Also, "Heterodoxy in the Stacks" is not my Substack. That was a guest article by me. Kmccook (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should realize that accusing me of mansplaining is sexist on your part. If you want to successfully edit an encyclopedia, you'll need to rid yourself of such prejudices. O3000, Ret. (talk) 02:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is why there are so few women editors--less than 10%. Can't you be a little more kind? Can't you help instead of criticizing? Lack of Women in Wikipedia (rit.edu) Kmccook (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
1Lib1Ref 2023
Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions of sexism

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. This is a low level info. You have, by my count, falsely accused two editors a total of three times of making sexist comments to you. The last was to SPECIFICO, who is a female editor herself. This is not just a violation; it is pointless as it adds nothing to a discussion and will cause editors to ignore your arguments. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying if an editor does not agree with you, she will be tossed from the club of editors? This is the second time you have come to my talk page to explain to me how I am to act. Maybe you are not always right. You have often been unkind to people, sarcastic, and arch.

Why is it important to you that I give up on issues of censorship?

The Universal Code of Conduct revision is being voted on now.

It states: 3.1 – Harassment-Harassment includes but is not limited to:

Insults: This includes name calling, using slurs or stereotypes, and any attacks based on personal characteristics. Insults may refer to perceived characteristics like intelligence, appearance, ethnicity, race, religion (or lack thereof), culture, caste, sexual orientation, gender, sex, disability, age, nationality, political affiliation, or other characteristics. In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not. Sexual harassment: Sexual attention or advances of any kind towards others where the person knows or reasonably should know that the attention is unwelcome or in situations where consent cannot be communicated. Trolling: Deliberately disrupting conversations or posting in bad-faith to intentionally provoke. 3.2 – Abuse of power, privilege, or influence Abuse occurs when someone in a real or perceived position of power, privilege, or influence engages in disrespectful, cruel, and/or violent behaviour towards other people. In Wikimedia environments, it may take the form of verbal or psychological abuse and may overlap with harassment.

The repeated arbitrary or unmotivated removal of any content without appropriate discussion or providing explanation Systematically manipulating content to favour specific interpretations of facts or points of view (also by means of unfaithful or deliberately false rendering of sources and altering the correct way of composing editorial content) Hate speech in any form, or discriminatory language aimed at vilifying, humiliating, inciting hatred against individuals or groups on the basis of who they are or their personal beliefs The use of symbols, images, categories, tags or other kinds of content that are intimidating or harmful to others outside of the context of encyclopedic, informational use. This includes imposing schemes on content intended to marginalize or ostracize.--Kathleen Kmccook (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"You are saying if an editor does not agree with you, she will be tossed from the club of editors?" You did it again. I never said anything even remotely like that. As for the UCC, I !voted for it and despise bigotry in all forms. Yet, you continue to make nasty assumptions because I disagree with your attempts to promote conspiracy theories based on poor sources. My mother had a degree in library science, worked in the Berkeley stacks, and had a genius IQ. Enough. Do not accuse another editor of being sexist. My polite advice has failed. O3000, Ret. (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve made your point. Obviously Kmccook didn’t appreciate the cooking analogy, which seemed a bit odd and off topic. Naturally a technology columnist may have an interest in the Twitter Files. There is no need to continue here. Mr Ernie (talk) 01:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O, thank you. Mr Ernie Yes the cooking and shopping wisecrack made me feel very diminished. --Kathleen Kmccook (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I made no such analogy. That was made by a female editor. O3000, Ret. (talk) 02:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And nobody said you did. Please, that’s enough. Mr Ernie (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorry, I thought it was you. --Kathleen Kmccook (talk) 02:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Above you wrote this " will cause editors to ignore your arguments." This reads like you very much made a suggestion of banishment. You have not been polite you have been condescending. You determine a person is a "conspiracy theorist" because you know that that kind of assertion dismisses and erases the person you castigate. I see the Twitter Files page as very much about censorship, not a conspiracy.

I voted for the UCC as well.

My efforts to defend myself have failed. --Kathleen Kmccook (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief. Because you continuously assume bad faith with anyone who disagrees with you or advises you of Wikipedia guidelines. Indeed, you are downright insulting to those trying to help. O3000, Ret. (talk) 02:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help with sandbox

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

My sandbox is no longer in showing all the subheadings and a block of text that was in another location in the sandbox appears below the subheading "Catholic Library Association that I can't seem to delete. I thought maybe I had too much in the sandbox so cleared out a lot of old projects but that did not fix the problem. appreciate help.Kmccook (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kmccook (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're aware of the fact that you can have any number of additional files in your userspace. I recommend that you use this capability to split out the pieces of projects that you have currently crammed together in the one file named 'Sandbox'. Each file can be given a suitable name, to help keep track of what's where.

While it is possible to reach software limits in terms of a maximum number of transclusions, among other things, I don't think your sandbox is there currently, but I see that it was considerably larger earlier. Somewhere there is a recommendation to keep file sizes under 200kb.

But I don't have any explanation for why you are seeing misplaced text or uneditable text - I don't see these things when I look at the sandbox. My only suggestion is to try to switch from source editor to visual editor or vice versa to see if they give a different view - it's rare, but not all that unusual for them to render the page differently. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. I messed around and it worked under source but I didn't know that. Appreciate the note on size and files. Yes, I did get rid of things like articles that had been accepted. I have learned from this. Thank you so much.Kmccook (talk) 00:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catholic Library Association has been accepted

Catholic Library Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jessamyn (my talk page) 15:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
1Lib1Ref January report
Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 3 • March 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 18:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 4 • April 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

New partner:
- Perlego
Library access tips and tricks
Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Kindly Ones (Powell novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Kindly Ones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ref after punctuation

Please don't put a space between punctuation, such as a period, and a reference, as you did on your recent edit to Irvington, New York. As a courtesy to other editors, if you've made other edits of this nature, please go back and correct the mistake. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good eye.Kmccook (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for your thanks! Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 5 • June 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

Suggestion improvements
Favorite collections tips
Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • July 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
Tech tip: Filters
Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • September 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 05:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 8 • October 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 11:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

While you are on any article, click the "Page information" link in the sidebar. The musk one is here. The number of watchers is listed in the first table. Cheers. Zenomonoz (talk) 10:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, in my face but I had never clicked that link. Thank you! Kmccook (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 9 • November 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 08:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Matt Taibbi

Your recent editing history at Matt Taibbi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Now follow BRD and use the talk page to DISCUSS this matter, as your restoration of my DELETION of your BOLD addition is classic edit warring. Seriously. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, this ends my contribution to this topic. Kmccook (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't have to mean that. This just means staying on topic, and the topic there is Taibbi, even in the context of the Twitter files. Note that every entry in that section is about him, and only when it's also about the Twitter files. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Cuadra

Hi, I noticed that you created a stub at this title from a translation from Spanish Wikipedia. However, the English Wikipedia doesn't allow any biographies of living persons that have no references to remain in mainspace, regardless of whether they were created from translation or not. As such, I have temporarily moved your page to draft space. Once it has a source, you may revert this action. If the page remains unsourced in main space, it may be deleted. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was too slow to add the obituary notice. I've added all I have now. Would you please look at this again? Of all "Award of Merit Winners" since 1966 Dr. Cuadra was the only Latino. I think he deserves a page for his achievements. Thank you.Kmccook (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, I just re-published it. Just remember for the future that all articles relating to living or recently deceased people must have at least one source immediately upon creation if they are to remain in article space. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good reminder. I should have included his obituary right off.Kmccook (talk) 02:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

Three new partners
Google Scholar integration
How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American Library Association Honorary Membership

I removed a section in the lead that seemed to be copied from here. Feel free to add it back in your own words. Thanks, v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 20:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was copied. I meant that it was part of the citation, but place it incorrectly. Thanks. Kmccook (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kmccook: Thanks for compiling this list. It has been used as a basis for linking awardee names in Wikidata. -- M2545 (talk) 11:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 1 • January 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 10:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 2 • February 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 18:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

IEEE and Haaretz now available
Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 3 • March 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 07:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 4 • April 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 03:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anita Coleman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David B. Gracy II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Daniel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 5 • May 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 13:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kmccook. Thank you for your work on Thomas Kimball Brooker. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this biography. I, too, am a bibliophile and really enjoyed learning about this person.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to say I received your 2 emails. So happy to connect with you! It would be nice to stay in touch. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I don't know how you have done so much. And so helpful to us and kind. Kmccook (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 6 • June 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 06:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

One new partner
1Lib1Ref
Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Please, use disambiguation when you add links to to a text. You linked Category:Burials at Oconee Hill Cemetery to Athens, Greece instead of Athens, Georgia. Dimadick (talk) 21:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe I did that. Kmccook (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank McClean

Your edit on this page is not referenced by a source. Please make sure to add sources before publishing an edit. Fenharrow (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was deleted before I added citation:The Book Collector 15 (no 4). Winter: 419-422. Kmccook (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 7 • August 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 13:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
Wikimania presentation
New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]