User talk:Klumpeet

Hi me, i like your talk page! Klumpeet C0ntr1b5 741k 11:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Klumpeet C0ntr1b5 741k 11:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O_o i has l33t signature~~~~Klumpeet 10:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 16:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~~~Klumpeet 10:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~~~Klumpeet 10:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message on my talk page[edit]

Hi, you left a message on my talk page which read : "Is this allowed?" COuld you clairfy? Is what allowed? You didn't say what you were talking about so its not possible for me to answer. Thanks, Gwernol 11:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Che rupert with star.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Che rupert with star.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Che rupert with star.png[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Che rupert with star.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Che rupert.png missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Che rupert.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Che rupert.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Che rupert.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]