User talk:Klixon2828

This is Klixon2828's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: URemovals (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:URemovals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:URemovals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klixon2828! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:URemovals

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:URemovals, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://uremovals.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klixon2828 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

undisclosed paid editor

Hello! Please unblock my account, as I'm not a paid editor. I wanted to publish an article that was not well written because the admin mentioned it looked like an advertisement, but it was not. In the future, I will use a neutral view when I publish something. All the best! Klixon2828 (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm kinda fuzzy on the relationship here, and while I believe you aren't being specifically paid to edit, I am unconvinced you don't have some financial or business interest here. At a minimum, you do have a conflict of interest here and I don't feel comfortable unblocking you without you demonstrating you understand WP:COI and how to contribute about one- as well as any unrelated topics you might contribute about. You are free to make another request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fixed the formatting for proper display. Please remember to place edits in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You posted a blatant advertisement for URemovals. How did you come to edit about that company? I'm a bit concerned that you don't seem to see how what you wrote was an advertisement. 331dot (talk) 15:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you point. I understand why it seem like an advertisement, That was not the intention. They are recently start their business in the moving industry, and they put a lot of emphasis for supporting local business and co2 reduction from air. We are working this industry as well, and we think they are definitely worth to mention on Wikipedia, even with a short article. The concept is was this, but seems the article is was not well written. Klixon2828 (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you work for a competitor, or at least another company in the field? 331dot (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No we are a house removal, and man and van service provider. And we are work with different similar companies, and basically we wanted to share our opinion. Not only about this company with from all of them, where we have experience. That was the idea. Klixon2828 (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]