User talk:Klavierspieler/Archives/2012

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261 Report on coordinators' elections Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives Guild Plans for 2012 Requests page report Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Kinder_Goat_Herd.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: Herr Beethoven with this link: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Herr_Beethoven and also added a link to the license: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/en:public_domain

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

It's more than all right, I encourage the use of any pictures I take. In fact, since I made the picture public domain, you didn't have to attribute it, but thank you for doing so anyway.

Thanks,

Herr Beethoven (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem, it's a great picture and I definitely believe in giving credit where credit is due.Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi there

I was the one who said that Olivia was originally named Alice Lawson, not knowing that they were 2 different characters played by the same actress. I was just fixing my mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.249.194.253 (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Message

I didn't do anything to the Independence Day movie page, I left it alone!173.76.119.10 (talk) 22:49, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

P.S. sorry about earlier, I forgot I had to put the title of my post between equal signs

That message on your talk page about "Independence Day (film)" is two days old, and I didn't send it: I only sent the welcome message.

Thank you for correcting the formatting. :)

Herr Beethoven (talk) 22:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Johnson

Hello. It isn't clear to me why this article was nominated for speedy deletion. It isn't an attack page. Do you think it qualifies under A7? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't nominate it for speedy deletion. The script must do that automatically when you fail an article for BLP issues. Herr Beethoven (talk) 03:41, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1805 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily! We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, TheSpecialUser TSU

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1805 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH! News Good article nominee 04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion AFCH script improvements 1.16 to 1.17 Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

• Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1805 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script! Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 01:05, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Toy Piano

Although the styling of the text could appear as self-promotion, the repertoire exists, it's valid and already premiered worldwide, therefore noone has legitimacy to act as a gatekeeper and conceal valid and useful information regarding the instrument repertoire. The text was edited to present a more neutral view, which should have been your attitude since the beginning and not a destructive one. The goal of Wikipedia is to inform not to judge or censor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.60.24 (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)