User talk:Kkandler

Welcome!

Hello, Kkandler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like International Aviation Group Development Corporation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Aviation Group Development Corporation

A tag has been placed on International Aviation Group Development Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clark Aviation

A tag has been placed on Clark Aviation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from International Aviation Group Development Corporation, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 02:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clark Aviation

A tag has been placed on Clark Aviation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Singularity42 (talk) 02:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clark Aviation

Please stop re-creating the same article over and over again for Clark Aviation. Unless the article meets the criteria in WP:COMPANY, it will just keep getting deleted. Singularity42 (talk) 03:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kkandler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I wasn't trying to promote Clark Aviation or International Aviation Development Group. I am an instructor at Clark Aviation and I thought it would be useful to document the legal requirements for the MPL license (which is very new and therefore difficult to find the requirements for) and create links for my students where they could add relevant documents about the Multi-Crew Pilot License. Please unblock me and give a little time for these articles to grow with the input from students and anyone else who is interested in MPL. Again, I apologize if I appeared to behave rudely, that was not my intention. I am very new to contributing and believe that the Multi-Crew Pilot License is a large enough change to Pilot Training to have it documented publicly. What better place to do that than Wikipedia!! :) P.S. XyNik is not another user name that I created, it is one of my students who wanted, 1. learn how to edit wikipedia articles 2. to contribute to wikipedia If you have also blocked him, please undo it. One more comment, I am surprised that this site (site admin?) deleted what would have become good articles in such a short space of time. A good number of international students who were interested to contribute to Wikipedia will be disappointed. It appears to me that my enthusism was mistaken for commercialism as I was busily trying to add references that none of your admin bothered to look at before they blocked me. Again, please unblock me, restore my articles, and give me a little time. Wikipedia is GREAT!!! --Kkandler (talk) 04:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined. There is also the matter of socking / block evasion: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkandler. Cirt (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

helpme-unblock

{{helpme}}

Hello, you seem to have used the {{helpme}} tag to request unblocking, but that tag is generally more appropriate for questions regarding how to use, browse, or edit Wikipedia. If you haven't already, please consider using the {{unblock}} template -- {{unblock|reason to request unblocking}}. Administrators will be able to find your page and review the circumstances of your block, even if it has been reviewed. You can also discuss the situation with the blocking administrator over email, or find other administrators to email here. You can also join a Wikipedia IRC channel or use the unblock-en-l mailing list to request unblocking. Please bear in mind that most of the users responding to helpme requests are not administrators. Thank you, and good luck. -Optigan13 (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry Investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkandler. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 03:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]