User talk:Kiwimac
Hello there Kiwimac, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
There is a copyright concern over at W. Wallace Smith and related pages that needs your attention. ---mav 07:49 Nov 25, 2002 (UTC)
Congratulations on the PaiMarirearticle. It is a subject I felt that I should tackle but you have done a much betterjob. I created alink to the article on the Volkner Incident. It is not usual in Wikipedia to sign your name to articlesn because and really interesting article usually ends up with amultiplicity of autheors. Are youplanning a seperate ariticleon the Hau Hau? Until I read what you wroteI had not realised they were seperate movemnets.. Much of what I have written on the Maori Wars is written with theassumptionthat they were the same body and assuchmay need correction. Keep up the good work ping 07:48, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Universism undeletion: Kiwimac, please see: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_undeletion#Universist_Movement Universist 03:46, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey bro
[edit]Your bio strikes me as a very interesting one. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you out around here. Blessings!! DeistCosmos (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Reformed Old Catholic Church for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reformed Old Catholic Church, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reformed Old Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the AfD was draftify, with the rationale that if the article or its contents had a future on Wikipedia, it was most likely because you would be able to flesh out the sourcing so that it either reached notability on its own, or was sufficiently improved that other editors could see how best to use its content. Because of your apparent CoI, this process would best take place in draftspace, where it is now. In draftspace, the CoI rules don't apply and you are free to edit as you see best, provided that you don't move the article back to mainspace yourself but instead submit the draft for AfC review.
If you have any interest in this task, please do not hesitate to ask me for help with either content or advice. — Charles Stewart (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)