User talk:Kinhull
| 16:30, Tuesday, November 5, 2024 (UTC) |
This is where I start talking....
I - am - a - fan - of - the - science fiction - author - Arthur C. Clarke
An - international - BOINC - community - team - who - too - are - fans - of - Arthur C. Clarke
| BOINC User | kinhull |
| BOINC Team |
Team ACC - Arthur C Clarke Fans |
| Website | Team ACC - Arthur C Clarke Fans |
| Forum |
Team ACC Forum |
| Statistics |
Team ACC Statistics |
| Games |
The Big Table Of Little Games |
| BOINC mini-FAQ | 10 Frequently Asked Questions / Common Problems |
Join Team ACC at any or each of the following projects:
BBC CCE (BBC Climate Change Experiment)
BOINC Message Boards (BOINC Message Boards)
MalariaControl (Malaria Control Project)
RCN (Rectilinear Crossing Numbers)
Seasonal Attribution (Seasonal Attribution Project)
http: //bearnol.is-a-geek.com/wanless2/ ------------WEP-M+2 Project (WEP-M+2 Project)
To find out how many edits anyone has done just click on: User Edit Counter (Interiot's tool)
The Contribution summary includes: Username, Total edits, User groups, Image uploads, Distinct pages edited, Edits/page (avg), Avg edits/day, Deleted edits, First edit, Edits by namespace, Various Graphs
Wiki sister sites
[edit]Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:
|
User boxes
[edit] | This user is crunching numbers using BOINC. |
| This user BOINCs. |
Comments
[edit]To add a comment CLICK HERE
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Trevor Hampton, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.divernet.com/profs/0402hampton.htm. As a copyright violation, Trevor Hampton appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Trevor Hampton has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Trevor Hampton. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Trevor Hampton, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
BrainyBroad 13:10, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi there. I see that your User page appears in Category:Main Page. I can't work out whether this is an automatic thing because of the templates you are using, or whether you added your user page to that category (same comments go for Category:Wikipedia featured content). There is a different category which might be appropriate: Category:Main_page_alternates. I only noticed this because I started to populate Category:Main Page, but I think user pages should be categorised separately, as they are different from normal Wikipedia content. I'll try to clarify this by looking at the Catagorisation pages. Carcharoth 15:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I removed the Featured Article Template (and replaced it with some others). I would like to know if there is a way to display the Featured Article, without populating Category:Main Page.
-
- Not a clue, I'm afraid. You'd be better off asking whoever created the category Main Page. Or finding someone who knows how to use templates. Sorry I can't be more help. Good luck! Carcharoth 22:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Venera 9 panorama.jpg
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Venera 9 panorama.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.65.227 13:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Venera 9 panorama.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Venera 9 panorama.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.65.227 13:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Venera 9 panorama.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Venera 9 panorama.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
suggested move: Malaria Control Project → Malariacontrol.net, also see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Malaria_Control_Project
[edit]If you have an opinion about what the true name for this article should be, please see here: Talk:Malaria_Control_Project#Requested move. Note there is an afd, also: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Malaria_Control_Project. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Pirates@home for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pirates@home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates@home until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Nicole des Jardins Wakefield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Character not notable outside of the work books/game she is in.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martin451 20:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 106.9 West Hull FM, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 106.9FM WHCR. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The article XtremLab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- computing project article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for refs since July 2015
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The article TANPAKU has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
computing project article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for refs since 2015
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)