User talk:Kingsjohn
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Aswamedham 002.jpg, by MER-C (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Aswamedham 002.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Aswamedham 002.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
[edit]
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 03:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Overwriting articles
[edit]Please avoid overwriting existing articles with new subjects as you've done to Aswamedham. If you wish to write an article on a different subject of the same name, please consider starting a new article with a descriptive title, such as Aswamedham (print media). A note can be added to the top of the existing article indicating {{for|the print media of the same name|Aswamedham (print media)}}. If you have reason to believe that your article will be more immediately relevant than this one, this one may be renamed something on the order of Aswamedham (TV series). At that point, disambiguation links would need to be added to the top of your article, both incorporating the reference already included and directing {{for|the television show of the same name|Aswamedham (TV series)}}. --Moonriddengirl 11:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Aswamedham. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. If you are able to supply verifiable sources for your proposed new page, as per Wikipedia policy, I would be happy to help you establish a new article for Aswamedham (print media) or some similar title. Please do not overwrite existing articles with your own. Doing so may be regarded as vandalism; Wikipedia's vandalism policies specifically refer to "Removing all or significant parts of pages, or replacing entire established pages with one's own version without first gaining consensus." --Moonriddengirl 03:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aswamedham. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 01:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Aswamedham, you will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl 12:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Aswamedham, you will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl 18:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with the comment above about Aswamedham. If you want to add this material, please give it a page of its own. Also, it will not survive on Wikipedia unless you provide at least one reliable source as to its notability. Sincerely, AndyJones 11:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Aswamedham News Paper
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Aswamedham News Paper, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Aswamedham News Paper is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Aswamedham News Paper, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Malayalam News Paper
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:Malayalam News Paper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)