User talk:Kinglouisleroi

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Kinglouisleroi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Flooded with them hundreds 16:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Louis Champagne (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need to connect the references provided at the bottom of the article to the article itself as well as add Wikipedia links. Need sources to indicate this is a notable brand.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:King Louis Champagne and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:King Louis Champagne, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:King Louis Champagne

The current text is an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. Some brands warrant their own article if they are notable enough. You would need independent, reliable sources to prove the brand's notability. You know, like "placed 24th in the 2017 Petibonum Champagne Tasting Competition" if the competition was reputable and the reporting source a notable newspaper, for example.

You would have to disclose your relationship with brand/company in question, if challenged to do so, to clarify any Conflict of interest. The text would need a more neutral tone and perhaps cite a local newspaper that debunked that ridiculous Louis d'Or story. But I guess you wouldn't want it that way. 2.247.243.131 (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kinglouisleroi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kinglouisleroi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:King Louis Champagne

Hello, Kinglouisleroi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "King Louis Champagne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 22:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]