Jump to content

User talk:Kingjatt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article The PropheC has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Kingjatt. Don't forget to categorize new articles, please. It's much easier for readers to find it. Can you also add more references? I'm afraid, that current sourcing of that article isn't sufficient. And one last thing: Wikipedia can't serve as reference for Wikipedia. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The PropheC

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The PropheC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article was speedily deleted, restored, deleted, and restored again. This is the third version, as far as I know. The sources are still the same - insufficient.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vejvančický (talk) 07:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The PropheC, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The PropheC. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]