Jump to content

User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2021/03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
  • A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
  • A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
  • There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Help needed

[edit]

commons:File:Kuwait_Towers_RB.jpg, a featured picture locally, has been deleted on Commons, but I believe the image would fall under {{FoP-USonly}}. Could you upload it locally? Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 03:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- King of ♥ 13:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
March 6, 12:30pm: Met Women's History Month Virtual Edit Meet-up

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community and the Metropolitan Museum of Art for our The Met x Wikipedia Virtual Edit Meet-up: Women's History Month.

We will be partially coordinating with Art+Feminism and all of the International Women's Day and Women's History Month campaigns.

Watch and join the livestream! The Metropolitan Museum of Art event on Saturday Mar 6 will host a tutorial and question-and-answer session live on YouTube and other social media platforms.

  • 12:30 pm - 1:30 pm - Presentation
  • 1:30 pm - 2:30 pm - Guidance and Q&A

Chat about improving articles! Support will be provided to help guide new editors in this area at Wikimedia Gender Gap Editing Chat for the duration of the campaign.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lht

[edit]

Template:Lht has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like you to reconsider your closure of this deletion review request. You closed the DRV as "overturn to redirect". While that was the solution sought by the appellant as well as a few other people, it was not a solution that enjoyed consensus in the discussion. That's because five people (including myself as the AfD closer) would have endorsed the deletion. Because there was no consensus to undo the closure, you should not have done so. Additionally, in your closure, you made no attempt at establishing what the consensus of the DRV discussion was. Instead, you closed the DRV based on your reading of the AfD, which is to say, you cast a "supervote" by substituting your preferred outcome of the AfD for my interpretation of the AfD's consensus. That was also inappropriate in my view. Regards, Sandstein 13:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DRVs are closed based on the merits of the arguments, and the "endorse" !voters failed to identify how exactly the AfD supported a consensus not to redirect. This is the difference between AfD and RfD: AfD applies to content, RfD applies to titles. There is no such thing as a consensus to delete at AfD per se, only a consensus to not have a standalone article on a particular subject; deletion is simply a byproduct of a topic not deserving an article and having no place to redirect the title. Thus "delete" and "redirect" !votes are treated the same way at AfD unless the "delete" !votes specifically address the viability of a redirect (basically bringing RfD-style arguments to the AfD avoid the WP:BURO of starting a separate RfD down the line). Otherwise, the page can be redirected to any suitable target, and an RfD is required to delete the redirect.
You can also think about it this way: After an AfD, someone can unilaterally create a redirect at the redlink, and it wouldn't fall under G4; it would require RfD to delete that redirect. It is also perfectly reasonable to restore the history under a redirect unless it contains policy violations. -- King of ♥ 22:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for closing the DRV, King of Hearts. Your close accurately assessed the consensus and strengths of the DRV participants' arguments with regard to Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. Cunard (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
King of Hearts, that is a reasonable opinion to express in an AfD, but it is inappropriate to express in a DRV closure. The DRV closer is supposed to determine whether consensus exists to overturn a contested AfD closure, not to substitute their own judgment about whether an article should be deleted for that of both the AfD and the DRV participants. You did not even attempt to assess the consensus in the DRV, and I am very disappointed in you for that. Please consider reopening the DRV and letting somebody else close it, or I'll seek community review of your action. Regards, Sandstein 16:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again: Cunard didn't even have to open a DRV to overturn your close. He could have just created a redirect himself, and then asked an admin nicely to restore the history underneath the redirect. The fact that he !voted in the AfD is irrelevant; otherwise it creates a perverse incentive for those wishing to merge/redirect to avoid AfD participation, and then create the redirect. It is only relevant if the other AfD participants have addressed the issue of a redirect and explicitly rejected it.
Anyways, the proper venue to discuss the status of a redirect is RfD, so I have opened up the discussion: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Squad (app). -- King of ♥ 04:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
King of Hearts, I am not contesting the creation of the redirect. I am contesting your DRV closure. I have asked for community review of this and a related matter at WP:AN#Review of DRV supervotes by King of Hearts. Sandstein 12:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Airlines Flight 1175 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Airlines Flight 1175, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 1175 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

March 13, 12-5pm: Asia Art Archive in America: Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community and Asia Art Archive for our fourth annual (and first virtual) Asia Art Archive in America: Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon!

Organized by Asia Art Archive in America and NaPupila in collaboration with Asia Art Archive in Hong Kong and supported by Wikimedia NYC, this event brings together participants to discuss, create, share, and improve Wikipedia articles about women and non-binary artists.

We will be partially coordinating with Art+Feminism and all of the International Women's Day and Women's History Month campaigns.

Register and join the virtual event!

P.S. Next WikiWednesday You are also invited to join our March 17 WikiWednesday next week with a Saint Patrick's Day guest speaker from Wikimedia Community Ireland.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for the result you make. -St3095 (?) 13:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 17, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with Wikimedia Community Ireland for St Patrick's Day
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

As this WikiWednesday coincides with Saint Patrick's Day, we will have a guest speaker from Wikimedia Community Ireland, about Irish-language Wikipedia, the efforts of the community in Ireland, and personal work on historical biographies with a special Irish-New York connection.

This month will also include a discussion of Black WikiHistory Month in February and WikiWomen's History Month and Art+Feminism in March, and of course the great work that is being done in these topical areas throughout the year. If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

23:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

SPI clerking?

[edit]

Hi, your name is listed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks under "Temporarily inactive clerks", and I noticed you haven't been active at SPI for some time. Do you think you would eventually like to return to clerking one day? If not, that's okay too, and I can remove your name from the list of clerks. Thanks for all the work you've done as a clerk! Sro23 (talk) 12:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can take me off, thanks. -- King of ♥ 15:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Self promotion scope

[edit]

I have a COI for University Bible Fellowship and working on making the article more balanced with reliable references. There is a Reactions section. I want to add some people's reaction who have positive opinions unlike some others mentioned in the section. But their endorsements are in the groups's homepage. Do you think it is a case of self promotion? Dlee612 (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WEIGHT is the guiding principle:
  • If a viewpoint is in the majority, then it should be easy to substantiate it with reference to commonly accepted reference texts;
  • If a viewpoint is held by a significant minority, then it should be easy to name prominent adherents;
  • If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small minority, it does not belong on Wikipedia, regardless of whether it is true or you can prove it, except perhaps in some ancillary article.
King of ♥ 15:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

You placed the David Petraeus article under the Pending Changes protection on December 3, 2012 and it has remained under the PC protection since then. Could you please unprotect the article now? It is not subject to active vandalism or BLP or copyvio violations. Looking at the page history for January through March I see only one edit that was an actual vandalism attempt. I don't think the article qualifies for the PC protection now. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- King of ♥ 02:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

[edit]

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)