User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2009/01

Image copyright problem with File:LA Dodgers.svg

Thanks for uploading File:LA Dodgers.svg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASDAQ.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NASDAQ.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 21:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Destructors_666

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Destructors_666. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the living word fellowship

hey there, you closed the last afd for the living word fellowship but didn't give an explanation for your keep decision. it didn't occur to me to contact you about this before i took it to afd again but as someone as suggested, that would have made more sense. if you have time could you share your opinion at the new afd. thanks and sorry for any inconvenience Jessi1989 (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the number of !votes does not matter; I didn't base my decision off that. However, I think that the keep !votes do sufficiently refute the reasons given for deletion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page

so are you okay with what i deleted?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EATC (talk • contribs) 02:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle is just too fast; I pressed revert before I realized it was a legitimate edit. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

okay thanks for the response —Preceding unsigned comment added by EATC (talk • contribs) 02:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do I get back the content that was deleted?

The previous redirect allowed prior versions of the page to be viewed, in order to merge sections of it into Timeline of the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict. Is it still possible to access the older version of the page now, and if so, how? (List of rocket and mortar attacks in Israel in 2009) Anarchangel (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll restore the history. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. Thank you very much. Anarchangel (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback request

Hello King of Hearts. I see you're on the list of rollback-request-considerers and would like to put in a request for myself. I have a large number of pages on my watchlist and check it several times throughout the day, so am often the first person on the 'crime scene'. Thank you for your time. Hadrian89 (talk) 12:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hadrian89 (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]