User talk:King man885

Speedy deletion nomination of Rothes juniors

A tag has been placed on Rothes juniors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Wadlow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi

what's your grandfather's name?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Osama bin Laden, you will be blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Teletubbies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 14:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King man885 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please may you unblock my account? I've gotten over the foolishness that had obviously transpired me to act ridiculous back when i was initially using this account. I have a clear plan of the areas i want to see improved on wikipedia, and i will also adhere to any conditions should i be unblocked. As i forgot my password, i am posting this reply via an IP. I also have 'no recorded email' when i attempted to reset it, so i ask if its possible to do any kind of alternative? However, back to my unblocking, i feel i can now contribute effectively towards the site.--89.241.216.15 (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, if there's no email recorded for this account and you can't prove your ownership, nothing can be done about that. Therefore, unblocking it makes no sense too. Just register yourself another account. To counter any possible accusations of technical block evasion: let's all pretend that I unblocked this account (which I would have, people tend to grow up in 5 years and it totally makes sense to give them a second chance). Max Semenik (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.