User talk:King Work

Welcome!

Hello, King Work! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC) [reply]

This is King Work's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mac Calvin (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mac Calvin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mac Calvin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, King Work! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Aoi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ned's Newt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will King Work (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

Hello,

Please do not make user pages for anyone but yourself. It is inappropriate for you to edit in any other editor's user space except if you want to communicate with them on their user talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I won't do it again 😁. King Work (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yo Gotti, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 07:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation sources have already been added to the article and also there is a new section with citation sources, go check it out. King Work (talk) 20:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to source your work. If, it's already sourced elsewhere in the article you need to add a footnote to the source when adding information, especially WP:BLP articles. Rob van vee 19:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir, I will. King Work (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would be greatly appreciated, and please call me Rob. Rob van vee 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed content from Grand Theft Auto VI without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Cash Boyz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fast Cash Boyz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Rockstar Games

Hello King Work, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Rockstar Games, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Only the author of a page can request that it be speedily deleted under criterion G7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That draft article is an copy of Rockstar Games do you understand! You know what, i will ask the author to delete that draft because its an copy of Rockstar Games King Work (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And the user of this page was deleted. King Work (talk) 01:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

Only an administrator can block users. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. But thanks for the warning. King Work (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Work (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry for trying to block another user can you give me another chance. King Work (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Because your block is for sockpuppetry, you must request unblock from your original account and declare each and every account you have used, at a minimum. The Standard Offer is likely the most plausible path for you. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Work (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know why i was blocked. I tried to block other users thinking they were admitting to another block user. I refrain that i will never do that again, and cause disruption towards other users. I was warned one time about editing other users pages to block them. I will not do that ever again, please trust me. I will also read the blocking policy to understand as well. And the accounts that you think i created. Those pages are not mine, not even Romello Brooks, and im not admitting to being neither one of them. So this is my orginial account not those pages. I just created this page. King Work (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A CheckUser has confirmed that is a sock of Romello Brooks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How im not even Romello Brooks. So stop thinking im that user. I don't know him, didn't see him in person. I don't have to waste my time. Because i already said im not admitting Romello Brooks. King Work (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already said I'm not going to cause disruption anymore. King Work (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...i already said im not admitting Romello Brooks, is definitely true, because you said the same thing here, with another one of your accounts. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and here you are not admitting again.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not my accounts. I don't know who is Richard Raleigh is. Y'all don't believe folks. King Work (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's another user from another IP address. King Work (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not wasting any more time with this. Talk page access removed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]