User talk:King Pickle

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, King Pickle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 02:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello King Pickle, I noticed that you do a lot of vandalism-reverting. Would you like me to grant your account rollback rights to help you revert vandalism more easily? Acalamari 19:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds interesting, and I guess I would like to try it out. Although, I'm still trying to figure out "normal" editing; I'll try to leave a reply on your page. I'm sure I will use it sparingly until I'm sure I won't break something! King Pickle (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Rollback granted. :) For practice with the tool, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 01:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from Horologium

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed unanimously with the support of 100 editors. Your kindness is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Wizardman, Black Falcon and jc37 for nominating me. — Horologium

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Gherkinus Pickulus Rex.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ThankSpam

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record.
I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~~~~

FYI

Were you aware - it's "Nihonjoe" - not ninjajoe... Just checking 7 03:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja

What? He's a Ninja? OPPOSE! LOL. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I screwed up! King Pickle (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

Click here to
automatically
add this project
to your
watchlist

Hi King Pickle, I would like to invite you to a discussion about Biographies of Living People

New editor's lack of understanding of Wikipedia processes has resulted in thousands of BLPs being created over the last few years that do not meet BLP requirements. We are currently seeking constructive proposals on how to help newcomers better understand what is expected, and how to improve some 48,000 articles about living people as created by those 17,500 editors, through our proper cleanup, expansion, and sourcing.

These constructive proposals might then be considered by the community as a whole at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people.

Please help us:

>> User:Ikip/Discussion about creation of possible Wikiproject:New Users and BLPs <<

Ikip 18:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thank you. :) --mav (Urgent FACs/FARs/PRs) 23:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]